...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Foresight >Expert groups as production units for shared knowledge in energy foresights
【24h】

Expert groups as production units for shared knowledge in energy foresights

机译：专家组作为生产单位，分享能源预见知识

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose - This article seeks to investigate the knowledge sharing processes in expert teams working with foresighting, creating knowledge for and about the future in electronic work groups. Design/methodology/approach - Observations and assessments have been made this study in two expert workshops conducted on the European level aimed at assessing the true status of plausible hydrogen technologies and their potential. Findings - Building on an understanding of knowledge sharing as cyclic in its orientation, it is proposed that knowledge creation in expert teams draws heavily on latent knowledge embedded in the individual experts. Explicating latent knowledge is seen as occurring during reconstructions that involve questioning, confrontations and debates. Such reconstructions are not fully explicated in the dualistic representation of knowledge often referred to as explicit and tacit. Research limitations/implications - Based on the assumption that expertise used in foresighting is embedded in some sort of implicit knowledge, which is latent, but not necessarily expressed previously, two hypotheses are proposed to be explored and pursued by means of a quasi-experimental design to improve the understanding of the nature of knowledge creation and sharing processes as well as the linkage between implicit and explicit knowledge. Practical implications - As a nominal group process, the use of an interactive electronic workshop seemingly produces information (ideas, assessments, measures, actions, etc.) more unbiased, more effectively and more abundantly than traditional expert groups. Originality/value - This research contributes to the discussions of the linkages between the use of electronic work groups as a mode for eliciting expert information, and the foresight strategic planning processes.
机译：目的-本文旨在研究具有远见卓识的专家团队的知识共享过程，为电子工作组的未来创造知识并了解其知识。设计/方法/方法-在欧洲级别的两次专家研讨会上对这项研究进行了观察和评估，目的是评估合理的氢技术的真实状况及其潜力。研究结果-基于对知识共享的周期性理解，建议专家团队中的知识创建主要利用嵌入在各个专家中的潜在知识。在涉及质疑，对抗和辩论的重建中，潜在的知识被认为是重复发生的。这种重建在知识的二元表示中没有得到充分的解释，通常被称为显性和隐性。研究的局限性/含意-基于在预见中使用的专业知识嵌入某种隐性知识的假设，这种隐性知识是潜在的，但以前不一定表达，因此建议通过准实验设计来探索和追求两个假设增进对知识创造和共享过程的本质以及隐性知识和显性知识之间联系的理解。实际意义-作为一个名义上的小组过程，使用交互式电子讲习班似乎可以产生比传统专家小组更公正，更有效和更丰富的信息（想法，评估，措施，行动等）。原创性/价值-这项研究有助于讨论使用电子工作组作为获取专家信息的模式与具有远见的战略规划过程之间的联系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号