• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Foresight >Twenty years of S&T priority setting in Russia: lessons learned
【24h】

Twenty years of S&T priority setting in Russia: lessons learned

机译：俄罗斯确定20年科技优先重点的经验教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose - This paper aims to present a retrospective analysis of the experience gained in the course of 20 years' history of S&T priority setting and critical technologies' identification, in terms of expected and actually achieved effects and lessons learned, Design/methodology/approach - The methodology is based on analysing project documentation and reports, as well as on interviewing project team members. Each project's effects are evaluated in terms of the six key foresight functions. Findings - The key factors affecting success of priority S&T areas and critical technologies' selection and implementation have been identified. They include focusing on practical implementation, linking S&T with socio-economic goals, combining thematic priorities with infrastructural and functional ones, as well as integrating priority selection in the S&T policy process. Research limitations implications - The task of evaluating priority setting exercises over a long period requires a substantial information base to provide a comprehensive comparative analysis. The projects considered in the paper also need to be analysed in a context of socio-economic development. Practical implications - The lessons learned presented in the paper could contribute to further development of approaches to selecting science and technology priorities and critical technologies, and their more efficient implementation. Originality value - Priority setting has significant influence on policymaking and decision-making at the national and industry level. The evaluation of a unique 20-year experience provides substantial information and practical hints for further increasing efficacy of this instrument.
机译：目的-本文旨在根据预期和实际取得的效果以及所汲取的经验教训，设计/方法/方法，回顾性分析过去20年的科技重点确定和关键技术识别过程中获得的经验-该方法基于对项目文档和报告的分析，以及对项目团队成员的采访。每个项目的效果都通过六个主要的预见功能进行评估。调查结果-已经确定了影响优先科技领域的成功以及关键技术的选择和实施的关键因素。其中包括侧重于实际执行，将科学与技术与社会经济目标联系起来，将主题优先事项与基础设施和职能优先事项结合在一起，以及将优先事项选择纳入科学技术政策过程中。研究局限性的影响-长期评估重点确定工作的任务需要大量的信息基础，以提供全面的比较分析。本文中考虑的项目也需要在社会经济发展的背景下进行分析。实际意义-本文中介绍的经验教训可有助于进一步发展选择科学技术优先级和关键技术的方法，以及更有效地实施这些方法。原创性价值-优先级设置对国家和行业层面的决策制定有重大影响。对20年独特经验的评估为进一步提高该仪器的效力提供了重要的信息和实用提示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号