• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Futures research quarterly >THE MECHANIZATION OF MIND: A DECONSTRUCTION OF TWO CONTEMPORARY INTELLIGENCE THEORISTS
【24h】

THE MECHANIZATION OF MIND: A DECONSTRUCTION OF TWO CONTEMPORARY INTELLIGENCE THEORISTS

机译：心智的机械化：两种当代智能理论的解构

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The two theorists deconstructed in this article reveal some striking similarities, presenting predominantly mechanistic depictions of mind and intelligence. Each incorporates neo-Darwinian paradigmatic assumptions about the nature of consciousness and intelligence, and its essentially epiphenomenal status in contemporary science. The texts are both heavily reductionist. Most notably, both the texts fail to adequately problematize the tenets of mechanical science and its mechanistic representations of mind. Neither of the theorists raises the issues of reductionism, materialism, nor the Western "objective" focus which attempts explication via the observer/subject split. Ways of knowing and the paradigmatic and civilizational constrictions of these are not addressed in any of the texts. The concept of mind extended beyond the brain is also not addressed at any point, despite the fact that Goleman explicitly incorporates intuition into his discussion.
机译：本文中解构的两位理论家揭示了一些惊人的相似之处，主要表现出对思想和智力的机械描述。每个都包含关于意识和智力的本质及其在当代科学中本质上显性地位的新达尔文主义范式假设。这些文本都是严重的简化派。最值得注意的是，这两本书都没有充分地质疑机械科学的原理及其对心理的机械表示。理论家都没有提出还原论，唯物论的问题，也没有提出试图通过观察者/主体分裂进行解释的西方“客观”焦点的问题。在任何文本中都没有涉及了解的方式以及这些方式的范式和文明约束。尽管Goleman明确地将直觉纳入了他的讨论，但扩展到大脑之外的思想概念也没有得到解决。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号