首页> 外文期刊>Geoforum >Thinking temporally when thinking relationally: Temporality in relational place-making
【24h】

Thinking temporally when thinking relationally: Temporality in relational place-making

机译:关系思考时的时间思考:关系场所中的时间性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper engages with relational understandings of place and place-making, and highlights the importance of attending to the temporality of place-framing/making in analyzing place politics and place-making practices. Building temporary, strategic alliance is a key step of place-making in place contestations, however, there is so far limited attention paid to the impacts of such alliance building on place-framing/making practices, especially when different actors are positioned in uneven power relations. In this paper, I use a case study of the 798 arts district in Beijing, China to demonstrate that the need of gaining politically powerful actors as allies can have substantial influences on place-framing in the first place and on subsequent place -making results. Drawing on data collected from interviews and policy and planning documents, I show that in a framing of the 798 arts district constructed by artists for saving the arts district from being demolished, the art component of the arts district was concealed, whereas components of architecture, historical significance, and city image were strategically emphasized for gaining support from the municipal government. These elements were later incorporated into the municipal government's framings of arts districts through policies and planning, but were twisted and realigned with elements like tourism and experience, which ultimately facilitates displacement of artists from the arts district. Thus, I argue, relational approach towards place-framing/making needs to be more attentive to the temporality of place-framing/making, which would allow it to more sufficiently address how various citizen-state relationships shape place -making and to become more globally oriented.
机译:本文涉及对场所和场所创建的关系理解,并强调了在分析场所政治和场所制作实践时,重视场所框架/场所的时间性的重要性。建立临时的战略联盟是场所竞赛的关键一步,但是,到目前为止,人们对这种联盟构建对场所框架/决策实践的影响的关注有限,特别是当不同的参与者处于不同的权力环境中时关系。在本文中,我通过对中国北京798艺术区的案例研究来证明,获得政治上有实力的演员作为盟友的需求可能首先对场所构架和随后的场所创造结果产生重大影响。利用从访谈中收集的数据以及政策和规划文件,我表明,在为保护艺术区免遭拆除而由艺术家建造的798艺术区的框架中,艺术区的艺术部分被隐藏了,而建筑,具有历史意义,并从战略上强调了城市形象,以获得市政府的支持。这些元素后来通过政策和规划被纳入市政府的艺术区框架,但又与旅游和经验等元素发生了扭曲和重新融合,最终促进了艺术家从艺术区的流离失所。因此,我认为,针对场所构架/建立的关系方法需要更加关注场所构架/建立的时间性,这将使其能够更充分地解决各种公民国家关系如何塑造场所构筑并变得更加全球导向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号