首页> 外文期刊>Geoforum >Subaltern counter-urbanism: Work, dispossession and emplacement in Gurgaon, India
【24h】

Subaltern counter-urbanism: Work, dispossession and emplacement in Gurgaon, India

机译:次要的反城市主义:印度古尔冈的工作,财产和安置

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper draws on field research carried out on two struggles at auto parts factories in Gurgaon between 2014 and 2015. Drawing on workers' accounts from the two struggles, I am concerned with how we might think about the women workers struggle, following Roy (2017) as enacting a gendered politics of emplacement. In doing so, I conceptualise the struggles as instances of subaltern counter-urbanism. Borrowing from Roy's (2011) "subaltern urbanism" and Fraser's (1990) "subaltern counter-publics" the struggles are counter-urban as they emerge from and are mobilised against conditions of urban everyday life which render women fixed into labour systems defined through hypermobility and flexibility. The struggles are equally counter-Urban as they break from hegemonic understandings of urban politics within disciplinary Urban Studies which tie subaltern political subjectivities to the itineries of territory, dis/possession and collective consumption (Roy, 2011). It will be shown that the women's struggles evoke demands for emplacement in the city that are future-oriented, speculative and always tentatively under erasure.
机译:本文借鉴了2014年至2015年在古尔冈汽车零部件工厂的两次斗争中进行的实地研究。借鉴两次斗争中的工人账目,我担心在Roy(2017年)之后我们如何看待女工的斗争。 ),以制定性别平等的就职政治。在这样做的过程中,我将这场斗争概念化为反城市主义的次要实例。这场斗争是从罗伊(Roy,2011)的“地下城市主义”和弗雷泽(Fraser,1990)的“地下反公共团体”中借来的,它们是反城市的,因为这些斗争源于城市的日常生活并针对城市的日常生活而动员起来,使妇女被固定在通过过度机动性定义的劳动体系中和灵活性。这些斗争同样是反城市的斗争,因为它们摆脱了学科研究中对城市政治的霸权理解,而后者将次要政治主观性与领土,剥夺/占有和集体消费的路线联系在一起(Roy,2011)。可以看出,妇女的奋斗唤起了对城市安置的需求,这些需求是面向未来的,投机性的,并且总是在尝试中被抹去。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号