首页> 外文期刊>Global Water Report >Speedy cooperation called for before next Ofwat Review
【24h】

Speedy cooperation called for before next Ofwat Review

机译:下一次Ofwat Review之前需要快速合作

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In early August, Ofwat published the findings of an independent Steering Group which had examined the way Ofwat had carried out its 2004 review of price limit: for water and sewerage companies in England and Wales. The Group had been charged with considering th suitability and integrity of the process, as well as seeking stakeholders' views as to its effectiveness and offering suggestions for improvement. Overall, there was praise for the review, which even critics believed was a major improvement on earlier exercises. Naturally, various stakeholders fought their own corner. The Environment Agency felt that Ofwat treated environmental improvements as optional investments -rather than integral parts of company investment programs - making such improvements subject to disproportionate scrutiny whilst exaggerating the contribution of the environmental program to bill increases. The Agency and other environmental groups were also concerned over what they saw as the tendency of companies to bid up costs for environmental schemes through gaming. And the water companies considered that whilst Ofwat was generally open and transparent in relation to the methodologies it deployed, this was not the case in relation to the issues of efficiency and capital maintenance.
机译:8月初,Ofwat发表了一个独立的指导小组的调查结果,该小组研究了Ofwat进行其2004年限价审查的方式:针对英格兰和威尔士的自来水和污水处理公司。该小组负责考虑该过程的适当性和完整性,并征询利益相关者对其有效性的看法并提出改进建议。总体而言,该评论受到了好评,甚至批评家都认为这是对早期练习的一项重大改进。自然,各种利益相关者都在各自为战。环境局认为,Ofwat将环境改进视为可选投资-而不是公司投资计划的组成部分-使此类改进受到不成比例的审查,同时夸大了环境计划对增加费用的贡献。原子能机构和其他环境团体也对他们认为公司倾向于通过博彩竞标环境方案成本的趋势表示关注。自来水公司认为,尽管Ofwat在部署方法上通常是公开和透明的,但在效率和资本维护方面却不是这样。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号