首页> 外文期刊>Human Resources 21 >One more straw in the wind in favor of mandatory arbitration
【24h】

One more straw in the wind in favor of mandatory arbitration

机译:反对强制仲裁的另一根稻草

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Remember we said recently (see 7/31/06) that your chances of making a mandatory arbitration policy stick were better than ever? They are. Yet another court decision, this time in an Oklahoma case, is bearing out what we told you. In this new case, an employer put in a policy requiring employees to submit all employment-law disputes to arbitration rather than suing in the courts. The policy was voluntary for three months after its introduction, and then became mandatory. One employee swore up and down that she'd never submit to the policy. Her supervisor told her she'd have to. The employee decided not to quit over the issue. Later, when she tried to sue for sex discrimination, a federal appeals court said she couldn't. By staying in her job past the three-month deadline, she'd accepted the arbitration policy as an implied contract, the court said.
机译:还记得我们最近(见7/31/06)说过,您制定强制性仲裁政策的可能性比以往任何时候都要好吗?他们是。这次在俄克拉荷马州一案中的另一项法院判决正在证实我们告诉您的内容。在这种新情况下,雇主制定了一项政策,要求雇员将所有雇佣法纠纷提交仲裁,而不是在法院提起诉讼。该政策在引入后三个月内是自愿的,然后成为强制性的。一名雇员上下发誓,她从未屈从于该政策。她的上司告诉她,她必须这样做。员工决定不辞职。后来,当她试图提起性别歧视诉讼时,联邦上诉法院表示不能。法院说,通过在三个月的最后期限之前继续工作,她接受了仲裁政策作为默示合同。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Human Resources 21》 |2006年第10期|p.3|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 企业经济;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号