...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>ICES Journal of Marine Science >Good ethics or political and cultural censoring in science?
【24h】

Good ethics or political and cultural censoring in science?

机译：在科学方面有良好的道德规范或政治和文化审查？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Peer-reviewed journals are the cornerstones to communicating scientific results. They play a crucial role in quality assurance through the review process, but they also create opportunities for discussions in the scientific community on the implications of the results or validation of methods and data. This requires that journals adhere to commonly accepted scientific standards and are open about their editorial policy. Norwegian scientists experience problems in getting research on minke whales accepted for publication where the data have been collected in association with commercial whaling. The journal Biology Letters refuses to publish papers based on data from the Norwegian whale register while publically claiming a sole focus on scientific quality. Although there are good arguments for claiming that clearly unethical research should not be rewarded with scientific publications, one also has to realize that some fields of research are beset with unresolved ethical and cultural debates. In these cases, it is to the benefit of the progress of science, and indeed society, to be open about the issues and support arguments through scientific studies. Political or cultural censoring of scientific information will in any case jeopardize the role of journals in quality assurance of scientific research and undermine the credibility of science as a supplier of objective and reliable knowledge.
机译：同行评审期刊是传达科学成果的基石。它们在审查过程中对质量保证起着至关重要的作用，但同时也为在科学界中讨论结果或方法和数据验证的含义创造了机会。这就要求期刊必须遵守公认的科学标准，并对其编辑政策持开放态度。挪威科学家在接受有关出版的小须鲸的研究时遇到了问题，因为小鲸的收集数据与商业捕鲸有关。 《生物学快报》（Biology Letters）拒绝发表基于挪威鲸鱼登记处数据的论文，同时公开宣称只关注科学质量。尽管有很好的论据声称显然不应该通过科学出版物来奖励不道德的研究，但人们还必须意识到，某些研究领域充斥着尚未解决的道德和文化争论。在这种情况下，对问题开放并通过科学研究支持论点对科学乃至社会进步都是有益的。在任何情况下，对科学信息进行政治或文化审查都会损害期刊在科学研究质量保证中的作用，并破坏科学作为客观可靠的知识提供者的信誉。

著录项

  • 来源
    《ICES Journal of Marine Science》 |2012年第4期|p.493-497|共5页
  • 作者

    Ole Torrissen; Kevin Alan Glover; Tore Haug; Ole Arve Misund; Hans Julius Skaug; Matthias Kaiser;

  • 作者单位

    Institute of Marine Research, PO Box 1870 Nordnes, N-S817, Bergen, Norway,Faculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture, University of Nordland, N-8049, Boda, Norway;

    Institute of Marine Research, Section for Population Genetics and Ecology, Nordnesgaten 50, N-5817, Bergen, Norway;

    Institute of Marine Research, PO Box 6404, N-9294, Jromsa, Norway;

    Institute of Marine Research, PO Box 1870 Nordnes, N-S817, Bergen, Norway;

    University of Bergen, Department of Mathematics, Johannes Brunsgate 72, N-5008, Bergen, Norway;

    University of Bergen, The Centre for the Study of the Sciences and the Humanities, PO Box 7800, N-5020 Bergen, Norway;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    ethics in science; lethal sampling; publication policy; whale research;

    机译：科学伦理学;致命取样出版政策;鲸鱼研究;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号