...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>IEEE Power & Energy Magazine >Markets for Efficient Decarbonization: Revisiting Market Regulation and Design
【24h】

Markets for Efficient Decarbonization: Revisiting Market Regulation and Design

机译：高效脱碳的市场：重新审视市场监管和设计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In the 1980s, some seminal works such as markets for power: an analysis of Electric Utility Deregulation by Joskow and Schmalensee and Spot Pricing of Electricity by Schweppe et al. set the foundations for electric power system restructuring toward a fully liberalized, marginal price-based market environment in which generators and end users trade. Even then, it was clear that the task was not going to be easy, but an increasingly and always significant portion of the industry and academic community thought that it was at least possible. More than three decades after the first power markets were implemented, the entire "power sector community" continues to discuss the suitability of relying on short-term market prices as an efficient signal to drive investments, especially in the current context in which not only traditional generators but also end users can decide to invest in energy supply resources, and an increasing amount of new generation investments have zero or close to zero variable costs, which some people see as a threat to the short-term market paradigm.
机译：在20世纪80年代，一些开创性的作品，如<斜斜体>电力市场：由Joskow和Schmalensee的电效用放入的分析和Schweppe等人的电力将电力系统基础设定为全面自由化，基于边际价格的市场环境的基础，其中发电机和最终用户交易。即使那么，很明显，这项任务并不容易，而是越来越大的行业和学术界的重要部分认为至少可能。在第一批动力市场实施之后三十多年来，整个“电力部门社区”继续讨论依靠短期市场价格作为一个有效的信号，以推动投资的有效信号，特别是在目前的背景下，不仅是传统的发电机还可以决定投资能源供应资源，越来越多的新一代投资具有零或接近零变量成本，有些人认为对短期市场范式的威胁。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号