Toward a document evaluation methodology: what does research tellus about the validity and reliability of evaluation methods?

de Jong M.; Schellens P.J.

首页> 外文期刊>IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication >Toward a document evaluation methodology: what does research tellus about the validity and reliability of evaluation methods?

【24h】

Toward a document evaluation methodology: what does research tellus about the validity and reliability of evaluation methods?

机译：迈向文档评估方法：关于评估方法的有效性和可靠性，研究告诉我们什么？

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Although the usefulness of evaluating documents has becomengenerally accepted among communication professionals, the supportingnresearch that puts evaluation practices empirically to the test is onlynbeginning to emerge. This article presents an overview of the availablenresearch on troubleshooting evaluation methods. Four lines of researchnare distinguished concerning the validity of evaluation methods, samplencomposition, sample size, and the implementation of evaluation resultsnduring revision

机译：尽管评估文档的实用性已被通信专业人士所广泛接受，但将评估实践作为检验标准的支持性研究才刚刚开始出现。本文概述了有关故障排除评估方法的可用研究。在评估方法的有效性，样本组成，样本量以及评估结果的实施方面进行了四行研究

著录项

来源
《IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication》 |2000年第3期|p.242-260|共19页
作者
de Jong M.; Schellens P.J.;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类无线电电子学、电信技术;
关键词
document handling; human factors; professional communication; reliability; sampling methods; system documentation; testing; communication professionals; congruent validity; document evaluation methodology; document revision; evaluation methods reliability; evaluatio;

机译：文档处理;人为因素;专业沟通;可靠性;抽样方法;系统文档;测试;沟通专业人员;一致的有效性;文档评估方法;文档修订;评估方法的可靠性;评估;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Toward a document evaluation methodology: what does research tell us about the validity and reliability of evaluation methods? [J] . de Jong M., Schellens P.J. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication . 2000,第3期

机译：迈向文件评估方法：关于评估方法的有效性和可靠性，研究告诉我们什么？
2. The PEDro scale had acceptably high convergent validity, construct validity, and interrater reliability in evaluating methodological quality of pharmaceutical trials [J] . Tie Parma Yamato, Chris Maher, Bart Koes, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology . 2017,第期

机译：佩德罗级可接受的收敛有效性，构建有效性和Interrader可靠性，评估药物试验的方法论质量
3. Evaluation of validity and reliability of a methodology for measuring human postural attitude and its relation to temporomandibular joint disorders [J] . Ramón Fuentes Fernández, DDS PhD Pablo Carter, DDS Sergio Mu?oz, Singapore medical journal . 2016,第4期

机译：评估衡量人类姿势态度的方法的有效性和可靠性及其与颞下颌关节障碍的关系
4. Evaluating the Validity and Reliability of Crack Dating Methods in the U.S. Legal System [C] . Laura Sullivan-Green Congress on forensic engineering . 2015

机译：在美国法律体系中评估破解约会方法的有效性和可靠性
5. A methodology for evaluating the development of new clinical emergency response technologies: Testing its validity using the case of electron paramagnetic resonance dosimetry. [D] . Nicolalde, Roberto J. 2010

机译：一种评估新的临床应急技术开发的方法：使用电子顺磁共振剂量法测试其有效性。
6. Evaluation of validity and reliability of a methodology for measuring human postural attitude and its relation to temporomandibular joint disorders [O] . Ramón Fuentes Fernández, Pablo Carter, Sergio Muñoz, 2016

机译：评价一种测量人体姿势的方法及其与颞下颌关节疾病的关系的有效性和可靠性
7. Toward a document evaluation methodology: What does research tell us about the validity and reliability of evaluation methods? [O] . de Jong Menno D.T., Schellens P.J. 2000

机译：迈向文档评估方法：关于评估方法的有效性和可靠性，研究告诉我们什么？

Toward a document evaluation methodology: what does research tellus about the validity and reliability of evaluation methods?

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅