Background:nThis research explores how controversial engineering decisions become the subject of'/> Framing Controversy on Social Media: #NoDAPL and the Debate About the Dakota Access Pipeline on Twitter
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Professional Communication, IEEE Transactions on >Framing Controversy on Social Media: #NoDAPL and the Debate About the Dakota Access Pipeline on Twitter
【24h】

Framing Controversy on Social Media: #NoDAPL and the Debate About the Dakota Access Pipeline on Twitter

机译：社交媒体上的框架争议：#NoDAPL和Twitter上有关Dakota访问管道的争论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background:nThis research explores how controversial engineering decisions become the subject of widespread social media debates, using the prominent case of activism opposed to the Dakota Access pipeline (DAPL). The #NoDAPL Twitter hashtag became the primary vehicle for activism, with Twitter users shaping the debate through how they framed the controversy.nLiterature review:nFraming refers to how information is packaged and presented. Because framing shapes the interpretation of information, it plays a crucial role in scientific controversies.nResearch questions:n1. Which framing strategies are present in the most influential (determined by the number of retweets and “likes”) posts using #NoDAPL on Twitter? 2. How do the framing strategies used in the most influential #NoDAPL tweets change in relation to major political events? 3. Do the framing strategies used in the most influential #NoDAPL tweets amplify the echo-chamber effect and polarization on Twitter?nMethodology:nThe team collected daily data on the #NoDAPL hashtag and selected tweets with #NoDAPL that had more than 1500 likes or retweets, and categorized them by the frames that they exhibited.nResults and discussion:nThe most-used frames were conflict/strategy and morality/ethics, with no noticeable middle path frame, leading to the echo-chamber effect and online polarization. The scientific/technical uncertainty frame was used only sporadically, in contrast with project proponents who tried to emphasize the pipeline's safety.nImplications:nEngineers seeking to understand and participate in public debates about issues central to their profession should recognize and engage the frames being used by the public to understand information. The project proponents’ defense of the pipeline fell on deaf ears, likely because they focused on safety rather than broader questions of morality. While engineers should share technical information related to a project under fire, they cannot ignore the concerns expressed by their critics.
机译：背景： n此研究使用与达科他访问管道（DAPL）相对的激进主义案例，探讨有争议的工程决策如何成为社会媒体广泛辩论的主题。 #NoDAPL Twitter主题标签成为激进主义的主要手段，Twitter用户通过他们如何构造争议来塑造辩论。n文献评论： nFraming指的是信息的打包和呈现方式。因为框架影响着信息的解释，所以它在科学争论中起着至关重要的作用。n研究问题： n1。在Twitter上使用#NoDAPL在最有影响力的（取决于转发和“喜欢”数量的）帖子中存在哪些框架策略？ 2.在#NoDAPL最有影响力的推文中使用的取景策略如何与重大政治事件发生变化？ 3.最有影响力的#NoDAPL推文中使用的成帧策略是否会放大Twitter上的回声腔效应和极化？n 方法： n该团队每天收集#NoDAPL主题标签上的数据，并选择#NoDAPL的推文，这些推文的喜欢或转发次数超过1500次，并根据它们展示的框架对其进行分类。n结果与讨论： n最常用的框架是冲突/策略和道德/伦理，没有明显的中间路径框架，从而导致回声腔效应和在线极化。与试图强调管道安全性的项目支持者相比，科学/技术不确定性框架仅偶尔使用。n含义： n寻求理解并参与有关其职业核心问题的公开辩论的工程师应认识并参与公众使用的框架了解信息。项目支持者对管道的辩护充耳不闻，可能是因为他们关注安全而不是更广泛的道德问题。尽管工程师应该共享与火中项目有关的技术信息，但他们不能忽视批评家表达的关切。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号