...
首页> 外文期刊>IIC:International review of intellectual property and competition law >'Apprehension of Bias' Interlocutory Decision of the Enlarged Board of Appeal 25 April 2014 - Case No. R 0019/12
【24h】

'Apprehension of Bias' Interlocutory Decision of the Enlarged Board of Appeal 25 April 2014 - Case No. R 0019/12

机译:扩大上诉委员会的“考虑偏见”中间裁决,2014年4月25日-案件编号R 0019/12

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

1. It is not only where a member of the Enlarged Board of Appeal is actually partial that an objection pursuant to Art. 24(3) first sentence of the EPC is justified. It is sufficient that there is a suspicion, i.e. an appearance of partiality. What is at stake is the trust that the public has in the Boards of Appeal. 2. Suspicion must be justified when considered objectively. Purely subjective impression or general suspicions are not sufficient. The point of view of the party concerned is important but not decisive. The question is whether a reasonable, objective and informed person would, in the light of the facts, have good grounds for fearing that the judge did not or will not hear the case impartially. 3. Suspicion of partiality can arise not only in the person of the judge objected to or his personal relationships to one of the parties, but also from the exercise of activities that might bring the judge into a conflict of interests between this activity and the obligations arising from the exercise of his judicial office. The incompatibility of functions performed at the same time can also justify a suspicion of partiality.
机译:1.不仅是扩大上诉委员会的成员实际上是根据《艺术》提出反对的一部分。 EPC第24(3)条第一句话是合理的。只要有怀疑,即出现偏见就足够了。危在旦夕的是公众对上诉委员会的信任。 2.客观地考虑时必须提出怀疑。仅凭主观印象或普遍怀疑是不够的。有关方面的观点很重要,但不是决定性的。问题是,根据事实,一个合理,客观和知情的人是否有充分的理由担心法官没有或不会公正地审理此案。 3.怀疑的偏见不仅可能发生在被反对的法官个人或其与当事一方的个人关系中,而且可能由于从事可能使法官在这项活动与义务之间产生利益冲突的活动而产生是因为他行使了司法职务。同时执行的功能不兼容也可以证明存在偏见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号