• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal >THE RESEARCHER'S CHALLENGE: BUILDING A CREDIBLE LITERATURE REVIEW USING ELECTRONIC DATABASES
【24h】

THE RESEARCHER'S CHALLENGE: BUILDING A CREDIBLE LITERATURE REVIEW USING ELECTRONIC DATABASES

机译：研究人员的挑战：使用电子数据库构建可信的文学评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study examined the accessibility of articles disseminated in mainstream business education periodicals during the three-year period from 1999 to 2001 in four representative electronic databases: ABI/INFORM, ArticleFirst, Education Abstracts, and ERIC. These results were compared with The Business Education Index listings. Information retrieval measures were then calculated. Precision rates varied among the databases. The recall rates for the databases were 90% or greater. Collection failure rates for the four databases exceeded 50%, while the collection failure rate for The Business Education Index was 42%. Adjusting the collection failure rate of The Business Education Index for only two years of actual publication, the collection failure rate dropped to 25%. Building a credible literature review using electronic databases has become problematic. The inability to consult The Business Education Index as a research launching point combined with the lack of accuracy and scope of electronic databases serve to diminish the reliability of electronic-based literature reviews.
机译：这项研究在1999年至2001年的三年中，通过四个有代表性的电子数据库：ABI / INFORM，ArticleFirst，Education Abstracts和ERIC，研究了主流商业教育期刊中散布的文章的可访问性。将这些结果与商业教育指数列表进行了比较。然后计算信息检索措施。准确率在数据库之间有所不同。数据库的召回率为90％或更高。四个数据库的收集失败率超过50％，而商业教育指数的收集失败率则为42％。仅在实际发布的两年中调整了《商业教育索引》的收集失败率，收集失败率降至25％。使用电子数据库建立可靠的文献综述已经成为问题。无法将商业教育指数作为研究的起点，加上缺乏电子数据库的准确性和范围，导致降低了基于电子的文献综述的可靠性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号