• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Information today >PayScale: The Compensation Wiki
【24h】

PayScale: The Compensation Wiki

机译：PayScale：补偿维基

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Question: What do Wikipedia, the YouTube/Demoeratic candidates debate, and PayScale have in common?Answer: They are examples of average people taking over things that once only the experts controlled. With Wikipedia, it's information; with the You-Tube debate, it's politics; and with PayScale, it's money.All three are part of the Web-enabled revolution: that's, bringing power to the people. It's a profound trend that's controversial; especially for the recently dethroned elites.Wikipedia and YouTube are well-known. Wikipedia, the collaborative encyclopedia, has become the go-to source for almost any reference question, much to the consternation of traditional encyclopedia publishers. In the YouTube/Democratic debate, regular citizens used YouTube to pose questions to the candidates, bypassing professional journalists who complained that it was amateur hour. In each case, however, the people won. Wikipedia has established itself as a reference standard, and the YouTube questions were pretty good. The elites are on the defensive.
机译：问题：Wikipedia，YouTube / Demoeratic候选人辩论和PayScale有什么共同点？答案：它们是普通人接管曾经由专家控制的事情的示例。有了维基百科，它就是信息。在You-Tube辩论中，这是政治；这三者都是基于Web的革命的一部分：那就是给人们带来力量。这是一个有争议的深刻趋势；尤其是对于刚刚退位的精英们来说。维基百科和YouTube是众所周知的。协作百科全书Wikipedia已成为几乎所有参考问题的首选资源，这在很大程度上使传统百科全书出版商感到震惊。在YouTube /民主辩论中，普通公民使用YouTube向候选人提出问题，绕过了抱怨是业余时间的专业记者。但是，在每种情况下，人民都是赢家。维基百科已将自身确立为参考标准，而YouTube的问题也相当不错。精英们处于防守状态。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号