• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Inquiry >The Ethics of Sexual Objectification: Autonomy and Consent
【24h】

The Ethics of Sexual Objectification: Autonomy and Consent

机译：性客体化的伦理：自治与同意

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

It is now a platitude that sexual objectification is wrong. As is often pointed out, however, some objectification seems morally permissible and even quite appealing-as when lovers are so inflamed by passion that they temporarily fail to attend to the complexity and humanity of their partners. Some, such as Nussbaum, have argued that what renders objectifieation benign is the right sort of relationship between the participants; symmetry, mutuality, and intimacy render objectifieation less troubling. On this line of thought, pornography, prostitution, and some kinds of casual sex are inherently morally suspect. I argue against this view: what matters is simply respect for autonomy, and whether the objectifieation is consensual. Intimacy, I explain, can make objectifieation more morally worrisome rather than less, and symmetry and mutuality are not relevant. The proper political and social context, however, is crucial, since only in its presence can consent be genuine. I defend the. consent account against the objection that there is something paradoxical in consenting to objectifieation, and I conclude that given the right background conditions, there is nothing wrong with anonymous, one-sided, or just-for-pleasure kinds of sexual objectifieation.
机译：现在看来，性客体化是错误的。但是，正如经常指出的那样，某些对象化在道德上是允许的，甚至是很有吸引力的，例如当恋人被激情所激怒，以至于他们暂时无法顾及伴侣的复杂性和人性时。有些人，例如努斯鲍姆（Nussbaum）认为，使客观化良性的因素是参与者之间的正确关系。对称性，互助性和亲密感使客观化的麻烦程度降低。按照这种思路，色情，卖淫和某种随意性行为在本质上在道德上受到怀疑。我反对这种观点：重要的是简单地尊重自治，以及客观化是否是自愿的。我解释说，亲密关系可以使客观化在道德上更加令人担忧，而不是更少，对称和相互无关。但是，适当的政治和社会环境至关重要，因为只有在存在的情况下，同意才是真正的。我捍卫。同意书反对反对异议存在某种悖论的反对意见，我得出的结论是，在适当的背景条件下，匿名，单方面或仅取乐的性异化没有错。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Inquiry》 |2008年第4期|p.345-364|共20页
  • 作者

    PATRICIA MARINO;

  • 作者单位

    University of Waterloo, Canada;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 哲学、宗教;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号