COPYRIGHT ROYALTY BOARD'S DECISION TO IMPOSE A PENNY- RATE ROYALTY STRUCTURE FOR CELL PHONE RINGTONES WAS REASONABLE

首页> 外文期刊>Intellectual Property Counselor >COPYRIGHT ROYALTY BOARD'S DECISION TO IMPOSE A PENNY- RATE ROYALTY STRUCTURE FOR CELL PHONE RINGTONES WAS REASONABLE

【24h】

COPYRIGHT ROYALTY BOARD'S DECISION TO IMPOSE A PENNY- RATE ROYALTY STRUCTURE FOR CELL PHONE RINGTONES WAS REASONABLE

机译：版权保护局对蜂窝电话铃声强加一分钱的版权保护结构的决定是合理的

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

According to a recent decision by the United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, the Copyright Royalty Board's decision to impose a penny rate rather than a percentage-of-revenue rate in estab lishing a royalty structure for ringtones under copyright law's licensing regime for making and distributing pho-norecords was reasonable. See Recording Industry Ass'n of America, Inc. v. Librarian of Congress, 95 U.S.P.Q.2d 1314, 2010 WL 2487842 (D.C. Cir. 2010). This was true, said the court, despite the argument that plummet ing ringtone prices rendered the penny rate inherently unreasonable.

机译：根据美国上诉法院在哥伦比亚特区巡回法院的一项最新决定，版权使用费委员会决定根据版权法的许可制度，为建立铃声的使用费结构而征收一分钱而不是收入的百分比。制作和分发录音唱片是合理的。参见美国唱片业协会诉美国国会图书馆馆长，2010年，美国法典第2卷第13版，第1314页，WL 2487842（美国哥伦比亚特区，2010年）。法院说，这是事实，尽管有人争辩说，铃声价格暴跌使一分钱费率本来就不合理。

著录项

来源
《Intellectual Property Counselor》 |2010年第164期|p.12|共1页
作者

展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Copyright Royalty Board Announces Commercial Webcasting Royalty Rates [J] . World intellectual property report . 2010,第3期

机译：版权使用费委员会宣布商业网络广播使用费率
2. Copyright Royalty Board Raises Musical Royalties For Colleges [J] . World intellectual property report . 2009,第1期

机译：版权使用费委员会提高了大学的音乐版税
3. FTC and Apple Sue Qualcomm for Cell Phone Standardization Skullduggery, Part 3: Determining SEP Reasonable Royalty [J] . Richard H. Stern IEEE Micro . 2017,第5期

机译：美国联邦贸易委员会（FTC）和苹果起诉高通（Qualcomm）手机标准化头骨，第3部分：确定合理的SEP专利使用费
4. Formulas for Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory Royalty Determination [C] . David J. Salant International Conference on Standardization Innovation in Information Technology . 2007

机译：公平，合理和非歧视性版税的公式
5. LINKAGES BETWEEN TAX SYSTEMS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE CORPORATE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF TRANSFERRING ROYALTIES, INTEREST AND DIVIDENDS BETWEEN GERMANY, JAPAN AND THE UNITED STATES (FOREIGN TAX CREDIT). [D] . WEISFELDER, CHRISTINE J. 1991

机译：税收体系之间的联系：德国，日本和美国之间的特许权使用费，权益和利弊转移的企业税收后果分析（外国税收抵免）。
6. Assessing the effect of an interactive decision-aid smartphone smoking cessation application (app) on quit rates: a double-blind automated randomised control trial protocol [O] . Nasser F BinDhim, Kevin McGeechan, Lyndal Trevena 2014

机译：评估交互式决策辅助智能手机戒烟应用程序（app）对戒烟率的影响：双盲自动随机对照试验方案
7. Reasonable Royalty Patent Infringement Damages: A Proposal for More Predictable, Reliable, and Reviewable Standards of Admissibility and Proof for Determining a Reasonable Royalty [O] . Reid E. Dodge 2015

机译：合理的皇室专利侵权赔偿：提出更可预测，可靠和可评论的可受理和证据标准，以确定合理的版税

COPYRIGHT ROYALTY BOARD'S DECISION TO IMPOSE A PENNY- RATE ROYALTY STRUCTURE FOR CELL PHONE RINGTONES WAS REASONABLE

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅