...
首页> 外文期刊>The international information & library review >Outcomes of the Bologna Process in LIS higher education: Comparing two programs in Europe
【24h】

Outcomes of the Bologna Process in LIS higher education: Comparing two programs in Europe

机译:LIS高等教育的博洛尼亚进程成果:比较欧洲的两个计划

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: The Bologna Process (BP) approach is distinguished by its emphasis on outcomes, moving the criteria for quality from input (what faculty teaches) to learning outcomes (what students will be able to do). Methodology: The authors want to look at the issues and opportunities involved in applying the learning outcomes approach in two southern European countries with similar traditions and no previous experience of this approach. Data were collected from a documentary review based on official documents and open statistics and a survey of selected stakeholders connected to the LIS schools of Parma and Barcelona. Findings: Within the BP framework, the LIS schools of Parma and Barcelona have distinctive missions and goals but differ in their approach to defining the attributes they expect of their graduates. Although LIS as an academic and educational undertaking has common historical roots in Spain and Italy, research and education since BP has developed in different directions. Limitations: Findings are based on the context of higher education in Italy and Spain, although the focus is on the two LIS schools of Parma and Barcelona. Originality / value of the paper: There are definite barriers to using learning outcomes as a measure of quality enhancement for LIS educational programs. Not least is the challenge of developing a list of learning outcomes that stakeholders at both national and international level can agree on. Nevertheless, this study concludes that LIS learning outcomes in Europe should be investigated as a means of benchmarking and determining the feasibility of guidelines regarding the equivalency and reciprocity of professional LIS qualifications.
机译:目的:博洛尼亚过程(BP)方法的特点是强调结果,将质量标准从投入(教师教的内容)转移到学习结果(学生将能做到的内容)上。方法:作者希望研究在两个有着相似传统且没有该方法以往经验的南欧国家中应用学习成果方法所涉及的问题和机会。数据是根据官方文件和公开统计资料进行的文献审查以及与帕尔马和巴塞罗那的LIS学校有关的部分利益相关者的调查收集的。调查结果:在BP框架内,帕尔马和巴塞罗那的LIS学校具有独特的使命和目标,但是在定义他们对毕业生的期望的方式上却有所不同。尽管LIS作为一项学术和教育事业在西班牙和意大利有着共同的历史渊源,但自BP以来的研究和教育发展方向却不同。局限性:研究结果基于意大利和西班牙的高等教育背景,尽管重点是帕尔马和巴塞罗那的两所LIS学校。论文的原创性/价值:使用学习成果来衡量LIS教育计划的质量有一定的障碍。尤其重要的是要制定一份学习成​​果清单,国家和国际各级的利益相关者都可以同意。尽管如此,这项研究得出的结论是,应该对欧洲的LIS学习成果进行调查,以此作为基准和确定有关LIS专业资格的等效性和互惠性准则的可行性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号