• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of agile systems and management >Transdisciplinarity within the academic engineering literature
【24h】

Transdisciplinarity within the academic engineering literature

机译：学术工程文学中的跨学科

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Despite increased discourse around transdisciplinary (TD) research, there is a perception it has received less attention within engineering. This is significant if, as generally accepted, TD increases the societal value of research. This paper benchmarks TD engineering research against the broader TD literature, addressing the question: How do the characteristics of the academic engineering TD literature compare to the TD academic literature in general? We analyse the chronology, source journals, and text of papers referencing TD within their abstract and compare this to papers that fall within the engineering subject area. The conclusions find that TD research is limited generally, and within engineering specifically. Historically, TD research focuses on sustainability challenges, a persistent trend within the general literature. Within engineering research, the focus of TD is wider and addresses operational and 'grand challenge' problems. TD remains poorly defined and future work should focus on clarifying meaning within the engineering discipline.
机译：尽管有跨学科（TD）研究的话语增加，但有一种感知在工程中受到不太关注。如果正如普遍接受的那样，这是显着的，TD增加了研究的社会价值。本文对更广泛的TD文献进行了对TD工程研究的基准，解决了问题：学术工程TD文学的特征与TD学术文献一般相比如何？我们分析了在摘要中引用TD的按时间表，源期刊和文件文本，并将其与工程主题领域落在落地的论文中。结论发现，TD研究通常是有限的，并且在工程中具体而言。从历史上看，TD研究侧重于可持续发展挑战，一般文学中的持续趋势。在工程研究中，TD的焦点更广泛，解决了运营和“大挑战”问题。 TD仍然仍然定义差劲，未来的工作应专注于工程学科内的澄清意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号