...
首页> 外文期刊>The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging >Comparison of image quality of 64-slice multidetector CT coronary CT angiography using automated and manual multiphase methods for the determination of optimal phases for image reconstruction in patients with various mean heart rates
【24h】

Comparison of image quality of 64-slice multidetector CT coronary CT angiography using automated and manual multiphase methods for the determination of optimal phases for image reconstruction in patients with various mean heart rates

机译:使用自动和手动多阶段方法对64层多层螺旋CT冠状动脉CT血管成像的图像质量进行比较,以确定不同平均心率患者的图像重建最佳阶段

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study aimed to compare the effects of the automated and manual methods for determining the optimal phase of image reconstruction with the use of 64-slice coronary CT angiography (CCTA). In 63 patients, the optimal trigger delay was determined using an automated technique (PhaseXact) and by manual phase selection from the images reconstructed at a 10 ms and 1% increment of the R–R interval. The image quality was evaluated using four-step grading. The mean heart rate in all the patients was 70 ± 10.1 bpm (range: 52–98 bpm). The frequency of obtaining diagnostic quality images was highest with the manual absolute timing method (97.6% of 753 segments), while it was 94.7% with manual relative timing and 91.9% with an automated method. The mean image quality score (1.3 ± 0.2) based on the manual absolute timing was significantly better (P = 0.002, one-way ANOVA; P < 0.05, Scheffe’s test) than the scores determined with the use of the other two techniques (manual relative timing, 1.4 ± 0.3; automated method, 1.5 ± 0.4). The best quality coronary CT images were obtained using image reconstruction with manual absolute timing for the ECG-trigger delay, while an automated method and manual relative timing provided diagnostic quality images in most of the segments.
机译:这项研究旨在比较使用64层冠状动脉CT血管造影(CCTA)的自动和手动方法确定最佳图像重建阶段的效果。在63例患者中,最佳触发延迟是通过自动技术(PhaseXact)以及通过手动选择相位来确定的,这些图像以10 ms且R–R间隔增量为1重建。使用四步分级评估图像质量。所有患者的平均心律为70±10.1 bpm(范围:52–98 bpm)。手动绝对定时方法获得诊断质量图像的频率最高(753个段中的97.6%),手动相对定时方法为94.7%,自动方法为91.9%。基于手动绝对定时的平均图像质量得分(1.3±0.2)明显好于使用其他两种技术(手动)得出的得分(P = 0.002,单向ANOVA; P <0.05,Scheffe检验)相对时间1.4±0.3;自动方法1.5±0.4)。使用具有针对ECG触发延​​迟的手动绝对定时的图像重建,可获得质量最佳的冠状CT图像,而自动化方法和手动相对定时可在大多数段中提供诊断质量的图像。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号