• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy >Scottish pharmacists’ views and attitudes towards continuing professional development
【24h】

Scottish pharmacists’ views and attitudes towards continuing professional development

机译：苏格兰药剂师对持续专业发展的看法和态度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Objectives To summarise Scottish pharmacists’ views and attitudes towards Continuing Professional Development (CPD). Setting Random sample of RPSGB registered Scottish pharmacists. Method A postal questionnaire of pharmacists’ CPD activity, views and attitudes was developed, piloted and sent to 2420 pharmacists. Questions were collated to produce total scores and to rate pharmacists’ motivation and attitudes to CPD separately. The number of CPD hours reported by sector and gender were compared (‘t’ test) and differences identified between hospital, community and primary care in relation to mean motivational attitudinal scores (Mann-Whitney test). Results Five hundred and forty three pharmacists completed the questionnaire (22.4% response rate). In this study 9.8% of the pharmacists reported spending no time on CPD. Comparisons of hours showed primary care pharmacists and hospital pharmacists reported similar times spent on CPD and significantly more time than community pharmacists (68 h and 66 h vs 45 h; P < 0.05). No statistically significant differences between genders were revealed. Internal reliability on motivation and attitude scores ranged from 0.74–0.83 (Cronbach’s alpha). Although scores were similar across sectors of practice in terms of motivation and attitudinal questions, statistical differences were consistent; showing higher scores for separate motivation and attitude among pharmacists in primary care than in hospital or community practice sectors (Mann Whitney test; P < 0.001). Community pharmacists had a statistically significantly lower attitude score than pharmacists in hospital or primary care sectors (Mann Whitney test; P < 0.001). Conclusion There is a section of pharmacists still not participating in CPD. Primary care pharmacists reported most motivation and scored highest in attitude score. Community pharmacists appear to be the sector requiring most support to increase not only their motivation to CPD but also their confidence and ability in participation.
机译：目的总结苏格兰药剂师对持续专业发展（CPD）的观点和态度。设置RPSGB注册苏格兰药剂师的随机样本。方法编写了关于药剂师CPD活动，观点和态度的邮政问卷，并将其发送给2420名药剂师。整理问题以产生总分，并分别评估药剂师对CPD的动机和态度。比较了按部门和性别报告的CPD小时数（“ t”检验），并确定了医院，社区和初级保健之间相对于平均动机态度评分的差异（Mann-Whitney检验）。结果543名药剂师完成了问卷调查，答复率为22.4％。在这项研究中，有9.8％的药剂师报告没有花时间在CPD上。工时比较显示，初级保健药师和医院药师报告的CPD时间相近，而社区药师的时间明显更长（68小时和66小时与45小时； P <0.05）。没有发现性别之间的统计学显着差异。动机和态度得分的内部可靠性范围为0.74-0.83（克朗巴赫的alpha）。尽管就动机和态度问题而言，各行各业的分数相似，但统计差异是一致的。与医院或社区执业部门相比，初级保健中药剂师的动机和态度得分更高（Mann Whitney检验； P <0.001）。社区药剂师的态度得分在统计学上低于医院或初级保健部门的药剂师（Mann Whitney检验； P <0.001）。结论有一部分药剂师仍未参加CPD。初级保健药师报告的动机最大，并且态度得分最高。社区药师似乎是需要最多支持的部门，不仅需要增加其对CPD的动机，而且还需要增强其参与的信心和能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号