• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice >Restorative justice and nodal governance
【24h】

Restorative justice and nodal governance

机译：恢复性司法和节点治理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

To date, a key emphasis within the restorative justice movement has been on the ways in which its values can guide the system of “criminal justice”. In this paper we argue that this focus has limited our ability to recognize various ways in which such values are being promoted within forms of governance originating outside of state justice systems. Through an examination of one localized governance model in South Africa, we seek to demonstrate that restorative values are being promoted through distinct goals and mechanisms developed to suit micropolitical, cultural, and economic realities. We suggest that the need to discover, explain, and assess such mechanisms is important to the advancement of the security governance literature, especially in a manner that is both intellectually and practically relevant to societies with deficits in state governance. Our empirical focus is on Peace Committees in South African communities that are operating, to use Braithwaite's terms, as forms of “responsive nodal governance”. Our depiction of these Committees raises both explanatory and normative questions that warrant further empirical study.View full textDownload full textKeywordsrestorative justice, security governance, nodal governance, South Africa, Peace Committees, qualitative researchRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2011.535686
机译：迄今为止，恢复性司法运动的主要重点在于其价值如何指导“刑事司法”体系。在本文中，我们认为，这种重点限制了我们认识到以各种方式在国家司法系统之外的治理形式内促进这种价值的能力。通过考察南非的一种本地化治理模型，我们试图证明，通过制定适合微政治，文化和经济现实的独特目标和机制，正在促进恢复性价值观。我们建议发现，解释和评估这种机制的需求对于安全管理文献的发展非常重要，尤其是在与国家治理缺陷的社会在智力和实践上都相关的方式。我们的经验重点是使用Braithwaite的术语在运作的南非社区中的和平委员会，作为“响应式节点治理”的形式。我们对这些委员会的描述提出了需要进一步进行实证研究的解释性问题和规范性问题。查看全文下载全文关键词恢复性司法，安全治理，节点治理，南非，和平委员会，定性研究，services_compact：“ citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，美味，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，发布号：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”}；添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2011.535686

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号