How legal pluralism is and is not distinct from liberalism: A response to Alexis Galan and Dennis Patterson

Paul Schiff Berman

首页> 外文期刊>International journal of constitutional law >How legal pluralism is and is not distinct from liberalism: A response to Alexis Galan and Dennis Patterson

【24h】

How legal pluralism is and is not distinct from liberalism: A response to Alexis Galan and Dennis Patterson

机译：法律多元化与自由主义有何不同：对亚历克西斯·格兰（Alexis Galan）和丹尼斯·帕特森（Dennis Patterson）的回应

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

First, I argue that legal pluralism is a useful descriptive framework for understanding the interaction among the multiple legal and quasi-legal normative systems at play in our globally interconnected world. Legal pluralism is a useful lens partly because it gets us beyond the endless and rather fruitless debates about how to define what counts as law and what does not. Instead, we can direct our gaze to efficacy: what do populations come to view as binding and what seeps into legal consciousness over time.

机译：首先，我认为法律多元化是一个有用的描述性框架，可用于理解我们全球互连的世界中正在发挥作用的多种法律和准法律规范体系之间的相互作用。法律多元化是一个有用的镜头，部分原因是它使我们摆脱了关于如何定义什么才算是法律和什么不算什么的无休止的，毫无结果的争论。取而代之的是，我们可以将目光投向功效：人群逐渐被视为具有约束力，随着时间的流逝渗透到法律意识中。

著录项

来源
《International journal of constitutional law》 |2013年第3期|801-808|共8页
作者
Paul Schiff Berman;
展开▼
作者单位

The George Washington University Law School;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Legal Insanity and the Brain. Science, Law and European Courts , edited by Sofia Moratti and Dennis Patterson [J] . Chloé Deambrogio European journal of health law . 2017,第5期

机译：法律疯狂和大脑。科学，法律和欧洲法院，由Sofia Moratti和Dennis Patterson编辑
2. The limits of normative legal pluralism: Review of Paul Schiff Berman, Global Legal Pluralism: A Jurisprudence of Law beyond Borders [J] . Alexis Galan, Dennis Patterson International journal of constitutional law . 2013,第3期

机译：规范性法律多元化的局限性：Paul Schiff Berman的评论，《全球法律多元化：法律无国界的法理学》
3. Dennis Patterson and Ari Afilalo.The New Global Trading Order: The Evolving State and the Future of Trade [J] . li class=last id=contrib-1 class=nameclass=name-search href=/search?author1=Ronnie+R.F.+Yearwoodsortspec=datesubmit=SubmitRonnie R.F. Yearwood/a European Journal of International Law . 2010,第4期

机译：丹尼斯·帕特森（Dennis Patterson）和阿里·阿菲拉洛（Ari Afilalo），《新的全球贸易秩序：不断发展的国家和贸易的未来》
4. The Enlightenments and Perplexities of Research on Legal Pluralism Theory in China [C] . Qu Yanhong International Conference on Modern Management, Education Technology, and Social Science . 2018

机译：中国法律复数理论研究的启示与困境
5. Isaiah Berlin's contribution to liberal theory: Pluralism as a romantic response to liberalism. [D] . Montminy, Annick. 2001

机译：以赛亚·柏林对自由主义理论的贡献：多元化是对自由主义的浪漫回应。
6. In response to the article titled Thoughts on the Ethics of Gestational Surrogacy: Perspectives from Religions Western Liberalism and Comparisons with Adoption Issue Date: January 2020 [O] . Salma Shabaik, Anita Nelson 2020

机译：回答符合妊娠代理伦理思想的思想：宗教西方自由主义的观点采用发行的比较日期：2020年1月
7. How legal pluralism is and is not distinct from liberalism: A response to Alexis Galan and Dennis Patterson [O] . P. S. Berman 2013

机译：合法多元化是如何，并不不同的自由主义：对Alexis Galan和Dennis Patterson的回应

How legal pluralism is and is not distinct from liberalism: A response to Alexis Galan and Dennis Patterson

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅