...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of constitutional law >Beyond 'law vs. politics' in constitutional adjudication:Lessons from South Korea
【24h】

Beyond 'law vs. politics' in constitutional adjudication:Lessons from South Korea

机译：宪法裁决中超越“法律与政治”的内容：韩国的经验教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Taking its cue from Michel Rosenfeld's formulation of a paradox arising from comparison of American and European constitutional adjudication systems, this article seeks to situate the development of constitutional adjudication in Korea within a global context. The growing influence of Korea's Constitutional Court has attracted the charge that it is acting too politically, as well as judicializmg politics. One symptom of this was the recent political row over the appointment of the Court's president. The Korean debate thus has much in common with the global discussions on judicialization and politicization triggered by the recent trend toward "court-centered" constitutionalism-a phenomenon with which our vocabulary and framework for discussing constitutionalism have yet to catch up. In order, however, to fully understand the sources of the debates surrounding the Korean Court, certain institutional settings and practices must be noted: procedures for appointing the Court's members, obligation to publicize dissents, absence of abstract/a priori review, and difficulty of constitutional amendments. Such factors conspire to create an environment in which a putatively "European-style" court is made to appear and operate more like the US Supreme Court, thereby generating talks of politicization and judicialization.
机译：借鉴米歇尔·罗森菲尔德（Michel Rosenfeld）提出的对美国和欧洲宪法审判制度进行比较产生的悖论，本文力图将韩国宪法审判的发展置于全球背景下。韩国宪法法院日益增长的影响力引起了人们的批评，即它在政治以及司法政治方面的行为过于政治化。其中一个症状是最近关于法院院长任命的政治争执。因此，朝鲜辩论与最近以“以法院为中心”的立宪主义趋势引发的关于司法化和政治化的全球性讨论有很多共通之处，这种现象尚未引起我们讨论立宪主义的词汇和框架的追赶。但是，为了充分了解围绕韩国法院的辩论的来历，必须注意某些机构设置和做法：任命法院成员的程序，公开异议的义务，缺乏摘要/事前审查以及难以理解的问题。宪法修正案。这些因素共同创造了一个环境，使假定的“欧洲风格”法院得以出现并更像美国最高法院那样运作，从而引发了政治化和司法化的讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号