首页> 外文期刊>The International Journal of Human Rights >The blog versus big brother: new and old information technology and political repression, 1980-2006
【24h】

The blog versus big brother: new and old information technology and political repression, 1980-2006

机译:与老大哥的博客:新旧信息技术与政治压迫,1980-2006年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

1 The data and DO files are available for downloading at http://www.svt.ntnu.no/iss/Indra.de.Soysa/default.htm. View all notesInformation and communications technologies (ICTs) prominently feature in the current wave of globalisation. Sceptics of globalisation suggest that the new technology will hamstring governments from acting in the interests of ordinary people and for furthering communitarian values, leading to demobilisation of reform movements and empowering powerful capitalistic elites. Others suggest that the new technologies will empower people at the expense of states, opening up public space for diversity of opinions and constraining the repressive tendencies of states and bureaucracies. Moreover, the new technologies may also allow mass dissent to mobilise more easily and hamstring the repressive power of states due to transparency and global audience costs. We address the issue by specifically assessing the effects of older technologies relative to new ones, controlling for time independently. We find very clear results suggesting that new ICTs, particularly access to the internet and mobile phones, are associated with better human rights, whereas access to televisions and fixed phone lines are associated with worse human rights. It seems that the new ICTs are qualitatively better for human rights than the old ones. Our results are robust to a host of different controls, testing methods and to the inclusion of time trends as a separate variable. The results taken together do not support pessimistic arguments about how new technologies can raise the level of dangerous dissent and provoke harsher human rights practices by governments.View full textDownload full textKeywordsglobalisation, ICTs, human rights, new technology, old technologyRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2010.518729
机译:1数据和DO文件可从http://www.svt.ntnu.no/iss/Indra.de.Soysa/default.htm下载。查看所有注释信息和通信技术(ICT)在当前的全球化浪潮中占有重要地位。全球化的怀疑论者认为,新技术将阻碍政府为普通民众的利益行事,并阻碍了共产主义价值观的产生,从而导致改革运动的复员并赋予强大的资本主义精英权力。其他人则认为,新技术将以国家为代价来增强人民的能力,开放公共空间来表达意见的多样性,并限制国家和官僚机构的压制倾向。此外,由于透明度和全球受众成本的原因,新技术还可能使持不同政见者更容易动员起来,并束缚国家的压制力量。我们通过专门评估旧技术相对于新技术的影响并独立控制时间来解决该问题。我们发现非常明显的结果表明,新的ICT尤其是互联网和移动电话的接入与更好的人权有关,而电视和固定电话的接入与较差的人权有关。看来新的信息通信技术在质量上要比旧的信息通信技术更好。我们的结果对于许多不同的控件,测试方法以及将时间趋势作为单独变量包含在内都是可靠的。结合在一起得出的结果并不支持关于新技术如何提高危险异议程度并引发政府更严厉的人权实践的悲观论点。 :“ Taylor&Francis Online”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more”,pubid:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2010.518729

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号