...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice >Ethical decision‐making and ethical responding: an analysis and critique of various approaches through case study
【24h】

Ethical decision‐making and ethical responding: an analysis and critique of various approaches through case study

机译:道德决策和道德回应:通过案例研究对各种方法进行分析和批评

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For three decades, the scholars in the area of values in educational administration and the moral dimension of leadership have conceptually argued for and empirically explored the centrality of values to educational administration. This centrality may be expressed as the roles and nature of values in decision‐making and conflict resolution. Increasing diversity and accountability in educational contexts result in more value conflicts and complex moral issues. This article reviews, identifies and discusses the strengths and limitations of various approaches to ethical decision‐making and responding in educational administration. The analysis indicates that no single approach is adequate to portray the complexity of the problem and provide guidance or help to school administrators in making ethical decisions and acting consistently on those decisions. In this article, I propose a comprehensive framework for understanding decision‐making and ethical responding, which takes into account the functions of values and valuation, rationality and reasoning, and both personal and situational factors.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2010.497260
机译:三十年来,教育行政管理价值观和领导力道德方面的学者在概念上进行了论证,并从经验上探索了价值观在教育行政管理中的中心地位。这种中心性可以表示为决策和冲突解决中价值观的作用和性质。教育环境中多样性和责任感的增加导致更多的价值冲突和复杂的道德问题。本文回顾,确定和讨论在教育管理中各种道德决策制定和应对方法的优点和局限性。分析表明,没有一种单独的方法足以描述问题的复杂性,并为学校管理者提供指导或帮助,以使其做出符合道德标准的决策并始终如一地对这些决策采取行动。在本文中,我提出了一个全面的框架来理解决策和道德回应,其中考虑了价值和评估,理性和推理以及个人和情境因素的功能。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand:“ Taylor&Francis Online”,service_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2010.497260

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号