首页> 外文期刊>The International Journal of Productivity and performance management >Collaborative planning, forecasting and replenishment: a literature review
【24h】

Collaborative planning, forecasting and replenishment: a literature review

机译:协作计划,预测和补货:文献综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Information technology; Operations management; Supply chain; Trust; Collaboration%Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide a systematic review of the literature on Collaborative Planning, Forecasting and Replenishment (CPFR). The review emphasises the descriptors of CPFR implementation and models, as well as the impact of CPFR and other supply chain collaboration (SCC) initiatives on supply chain (SC) performance. Design/methodology/approach - The systematic review includes 50 full-text papers retrieved from four databases: Emerald, EBSCO, ScienceDirect and Wiley. Rigorous and verifiable keywords, review steps and selection criteria were applied to the database and inter-coders agreement was systematically checked. Findings - There is no consensus regarding the breadth and scope of CPFR configurations. CPFR is context-dependent and varies according to the configuration of the SC. Trust, information-communication technology and the quality of information sharing are main enablers and inhibitors of implementation. Practical implications - Practitioners will benefit from insights related to the choice of SCC configurations (e.g. number of partners, nature of products and spatial complexity), the importance of trust and empowerment for SCC and the need to outweigh carefully the costs and benefits of specific SCC before implementation. Originality/value - CPFR, which is considered by many to be the most advanced and the most comprehensive SCC process and has a direct impact upon SC performance. Nonetheless, efforts to synthesise the overall state of the art in CPFR have been rather limited to date. As an effort to fill this gap, this paper provides a better understanding of the role of CPFR as a determinant of SC performance. As an effort to contribute to complete the cycle of theory building based on the literature review, seven propositions for CPFR research are put forward.
机译:信息技术;运营管理;供应链;信任;协作百分比用途-本文的目的是对协作计划,预测和补给(CPFR)的文献进行系统的综述。审查强调了CPFR实施和模型的描述符,以及CPFR和其他供应链协作(SCC)举措对供应链(SC)绩效的影响。设计/方法/方法-系统评价包括从四个数据库(Emerald,EBSCO,ScienceDirect和Wiley)检索的50篇全文论文。严格且可验证的关键字,复查步骤和选择标准已应用于数据库,并且系统地检查了编码员间的协议。发现-关于CPFR配置的广度和范围尚无共识。 CPFR取决于上下文,并且根据SC的配置而有所不同。信任,信息通信技术和信息共享的质量是实施的主要推动者和阻碍者。实际意义-从业者将受益于与SCC配置选择有关的见解(例如,合作伙伴数量,产品性质和空间复杂性),对SCC的信任和授权的重要性以及认真考虑特定SCC的成本和收益的需求实施之前。原创性/价值-CPFR,被许多人认为是最先进,最全面的SCC流程,对SC性能有直接影响。然而,迄今为止,合成CPFR的总体技术水平的努力还相当有限。为了填补这一空白,本文更好地理解了CPFR作为SC性能决定因素的作用。为了努力完成基于文献综述的理论构建循环,提出了CPFR研究的七个命题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号