【24h】

HOW USEFUL IS SELECTION?

机译:选择有何用?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The author begins by reviewing the literature on the selection of applicants for psychoanalytic training. Having himself been active in a training role in the Dutch Society for many years, he then discusses that society's selection approach and compares it with the literature reports, which he in many cases finds inconclusive and incomplete, partly because relevant information is often unavailable for reasons of discretion. A major problem is stated to be the difficulty of defining the concept of a good psychoanalyst. Although most of the published material concentrates on the qualities of the applicant, it is pointed out that the selectors and the manner of their interaction with the applicant are also important. The centrepiece of the paper is a detailed report on the results of a survey by the author of the methods used by the Dutch Society's selectors over a seventeen-year period, in which the approaches of selectors of different ages and backgrounds and their responses to different types of applicants are compared by statistical techniques. Selection methods proved to be largely intuitive and the survey respondents had difficulty in defining the criteria they used. For all the imponderables, the author notes that no training committee is prepared to abandon selection—usually by interview—even if it can ultimately do no more than assess an applicant's analysability and life accomplishments.
机译:作者首先回顾有关选择精神分析培训申请人的文献。他本人活跃于荷兰协会多年,随后讨论了该协会的甄选方法,并将其与文献报告进行了比较,在许多情况下,他认为报告尚无定论和不完整,部分原因是由于相关原因通常无法获得相关信息酌情权。据说一个主要问题是难以定义好的心理分析家的概念。尽管大多数已出版的材料都集中在申请人的素质上,但要指出的是,选择器及其与申请人互动的方式也很重要。本文的核心是一份详细的报告,报告作者调查了荷兰协会十七年来选民使用的方法的调查结果,其中不同年龄和背景的选民的方法以及他们对不同选民的反应通过统计技术比较申请人的类型。事实证明,选择方法在很大程度上是直观的,被调查者很难定义他们使用的标准。对于所有弱项,作者指出,没有培训委员会准备放弃选择(通常是通过面试),即使培训委员会最终只能做的只是评估申请人的可分析性和生活成就。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号