...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of urban and regional research >URBAN ENTREPRENEURIALISM VS MARKET SOCIETY: The Geography of China's Neoliberal Urbanism
【24h】

URBAN ENTREPRENEURIALISM VS MARKET SOCIETY: The Geography of China's Neoliberal Urbanism

机译:城市企业家主义与市场社会:中国新自由主义城市主义的地理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Existing literature on China's neoliberal urbanism is preoccupied with its institutional incentives and political-economy dynamics, which are characterized by state dominance through sponsorship and supervision of capital-market operations that drive pro-growth aspirations and gentrification strategies. Meanwhile, society, confronted with brutal neoliberal production of urban space, is vulnerable to dispossession and displacement. In this article, we draw upon an ethnographic study conducted at the Higher Education Mega Centre (HEMC) of Guangzhou in an attempt to revisit China's neoliberal urbanism beyond the Marxian political-economy repertoire, and shift the theoretical focus from production to consumption. In an institutionalized neoliberal context, the state-market-society nexus is closely intertwined-a process that manifests itself as the entangling of state and market, the establishment of a market society, the reflexive effects between neoliberalization and Chinese urban entrepreneurialism, and the capital-centric rule in urban (re)development. In particular, the socioeconomic and sociospatial contradictions in the HEMC case indicate aggressive and insatiable production of urban space, which has been led by the entrepreneurial local state, but is bounded by the market-oriented and capital-centric rules of institutionalized neoliberalization. The article concludes by calling for pragmatic reflection on the 'hard' neoliberal urbanism of the global South.
机译:现有的有关中国新自由主义城市主义的文献都集中在其制度激励和政治经济动力上,其特点是通过赞助和监督资本市场运营来推动国家发展,从而推动促进增长的愿望和中产阶级化战略。同时,面对残酷的新自由主义城市空间生产的社会,很容易被剥夺和流离失所。在本文中,我们借鉴了在广州高等教育超级中心(HEMC)上进行的人种学研究,目的是重新审视马克思主义政治经济理论之外的中国新自由主义城市主义,并将理论重点从生产转向消费。在制度化的新自由主义背景下,国家-市场-社会之间的关系紧密地交织在一起,这一过程表现为国家与市场的纠缠,市场社会的建立,新自由主义与中国城市企业家精神以及资本之间的反身作用。 (再)发展中的中心规则。特别是,在HEMC案中的社会经济和社会空间矛盾​​表明,城市空间的侵略性和永不满足地生产已由当地企业家主导,但受到制度化的新自由化的以市场为导向和以资本为中心的规则的束缚。最后,文章呼吁对全球南方的“硬性”新自由主义城市主义进行务实的思考。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号