...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of water resources development >What's the middle ground? Institutionalized vs. emerging water-related stakeholder engagement processes
【24h】

What's the middle ground? Institutionalized vs. emerging water-related stakeholder engagement processes

机译：中间地点是什么？制度化与新兴水有关的利益相关者参与过程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In this day and age, it is widely argued that stakeholder engagement in water-related decision-making processes yields many benefits, including legitimacy, acceptance and trust. Key legal frameworks, such as the European Water Framework Directive and the Aarhus Convention, have spurred the emergence of formal forms of stakeholder engagement. On the other hand, many engagement processes are spontaneous and self-organized. This article investigates the strategies used in formal (government-led) and informal (bottom-up) engagement processes in search of a middle ground. To this end, case studies in the Netherlands, the United States, Uganda and Ethiopia are analyzed using the OECD's stakeholder engagement checklist. We conclude with reflection on the ways forward to make formal and informal stakeholder engagement complementary.
机译：在这一天和年龄，据称，利益相关者参与与水有关的决策过程产生了许多福利，包括合法性，接受和信任。欧洲水框架指令及奥胡斯公约等重点法律框架已经促使了正式形式的利益相关者参与的出现。另一方面，许多参与过程是自发的和自我组织的。本文调查正式（政府主导）和非正式（自下而上）参与流程的策略，以寻求中间地面。为此，使用经合组织的利益相关方参与清单分析荷兰，美国，乌干达和埃塞俄比亚的案例研究。我们通过对向前方式进行正式和非正式利益相关者参与互补的方式结束。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号