• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Relations of the Asia-Pacific >Southeast Asian peace revisited: a capitalist trajectory
【24h】

Southeast Asian peace revisited: a capitalist trajectory

机译：重新审视东南亚和平：资本主义的轨迹

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The scholarship has argued that the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) security management, outweighing democracy and economic interdependence, is the main force constituting Southeast Asian peace. However, although neither democracy nor economic interdependence significantly contributes to peacefulness in Southeast Asia, this study posits and finds that prior literature overlooks the possible conflict-constraining effect of a ruling group's desire and resolve to pursue economic development with liberal capitalist economic policy, which causes that the pacifying effect of ASEAN security management to be exaggerated. This study distinguishes the conflict-constraining effect of liberal capitalist economic development policy from the outcome effects of economic interdependence and the ASEAN security management and argues that the common interests and preferences of adopting economic liberalization policy for economic development exert a more significant effect in preventing conflicts in Southeast Asia. Empirical analyses of the onset of militarized interstate disputes between Southeast Asian states from 1950 to 2000 support this argument.
机译：该奖学金认为，东南亚国家联盟（ASEAN）的安全管理胜过民主和经济相互依存，是构成东南亚和平的主要力量。但是，尽管民主和经济相互依存关系均未对东南亚的和平作出重大贡献，但这项研究提出并发现，先前的文献忽视了执政集团的愿望和决心以自由资本主义经济政策追求经济发展的可能的冲突抑制作用，这导致东盟安全管理的和平作用被夸大了。这项研究将自由资本主义经济发展政策的冲突抑制效果与经济相互依存和东盟安全管理的结果效果区分开来，并认为采用经济自由化政策促进经济发展的共同利益和偏好在预防冲突方面发挥了更为重要的作用。在东南亚。对1950年至2000年东南亚国家之间军事化国家间争端的发生进行的经验分析支持了这一论点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号