• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Studies in the Philosophy of Science >Philosophy of Science or Science and Technology Studies? Economic Methodology and Auction Theory
【24h】

Philosophy of Science or Science and Technology Studies? Economic Methodology and Auction Theory

机译：科学哲学还是科学技术研究？经济方法论与拍卖理论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article addresses some recent tendencies in economic methodology defined as a philosophy of science for economics. I review the problem of normative/positive distinction in methodology and argue that normativity in its past forms is intolerable today but is, at the same time, indispensable for methodological inquiry. Using recent texts by Mirowski and Nik-Khah and by Alexandrova and Northcott on the applications of auction theory as a case study, I compare in more detail various approaches to economic methodology inspired by the science and technology studies (STS) and philosophy of science literatures, respectively. On the basis of this comparison, I show that the STS programme in economic methodology may prove fruitful in the future, but there is still a place for more aprioristic philosophical thinking. Methodology and history of economics also play a fundamental role that goes beyond the descriptive analysis of STS and offer conceptual clarification paired with normative concerns provided by philosophers of science.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2012.731732
机译：本文讨论了被定义为经济学的科学哲学的经济方法论的一些最新趋势。我回顾了方法论中的规范性/肯定性区别问题，并认为，过去形式的规范性在今天是不能容忍的，但同时对于方法论探究也是必不可少的。我以Mirowski和Nik-Khah以及Alexandrova和Northcott的最新著作为例，对拍卖理论的应用进行了比较，我比较了受到科学技术研究（STS）和科学文献哲学启发的各种经济方法论方法， 分别。在此比较的基础上，我证明了经济方法论上的STS计划将来可能会硕果累累，但是仍然存在着更多的先验哲学思想。经济学的方法论和历史也起着超越STS的描述性分析的基本作用，并提供概念上的澄清以及科学哲学家提供的规范关注。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand：“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线” services_compact：“ citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，可口，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，发布：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2012.731732

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号