首页> 外文期刊>Issues in Science and Technology >Qualitative Metrics in Science Policy: What Can't Be Counted, Counts
【24h】

Qualitative Metrics in Science Policy: What Can't Be Counted, Counts

机译:科学政策中的定性指标:无法计数,很重要

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The past half-century has ushered in a veritable revolution in the science of metrics, as the surprisingly long life of Moore's Law and related advances in information technology have led to a vast reservoir of quantitative information ripe for study with powerful analytical tools. For instance, captured in the research literature are methods to measure the quality of one's health, to quantify athletic performance, and to determine something as innately intangible as consumer confidence. Even in the domain of science and technology, economists have made efforts to assess the return on investment (ROI) of science and engineering research funded by government and industry, finding that university-level research is one of the best long-term investments that can be made.
机译:过去的半个世纪已经在度量科学领域掀起了一场真正的革命,因为摩尔定律的超长寿命以及信息技术的相关进步导致了数量庞大的定量信息储备,这些成熟的定量信息已经可以使用强大的分析工具进行研究了。例如,研究文献中介绍的方法是测量一个人的健康质量,量化运动表现并确定与消费者的信心一样天生无形的方法。即使在科学和技术领域,经济学家也努力评估由政府和工业界资助的科学和工程研究的投资回报(ROI),并发现大学水平的研究是最好的长期投资之一,被制造。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Issues in Science and Technology》 |2012年第1期|p.21-24|共4页
  • 作者

    RAHUL REKHI; NEAL LANE;

  • 作者单位

    Departments of Bioengineering and Economics at Rice University James A. Baker Ⅲ Institute for Public Policy;

    Departments of Bioengineering and Economics at Rice University James A. Baker Ⅲ Institute for Public Policy;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号