...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Jane's Defence Weekly >PFI Unfairly maligned?
【24h】

PFI Unfairly maligned?

机译：PFI不公正地受到损害？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The effectiveness of the private finance initiative (PFI) as a procurement model that delivers true value for money continues to be the topic of much debate since its introduction to the UK under John Major's Conservative government in the 1990s. This is particularly so in the defence sector, where an alarming number of high-profile PFI programmes have suffered long delays, spiralling costs and cancellations. PFIs - the most common form of public-private partnerships (PPPs) - are long-term contracts established between public authorities and private-sector companies, such as the Ministry of Defence (MoD) and defence contractors, with project funding raised by the companies. Typically, the private sector becomes responsible for the initial design, construction, operation and maintenance of the project, providing incentives for low-cost construction and minimum life-cycle costs. As a result, project risks are transferred to the private sector, which include reducing cost overruns and delays during construction.
机译：自从1990年代约翰·梅杰（John Major）的保守党政府将其引入英国以来，私人融资计划（PFI）作为能够带来真正物有所值的采购模式的有效性一直是许多争论的话题。在国防部门尤其如此，令人震惊的高规格PFI计划遭受了长时间的延误，成本不断攀升和取消。 PFI是最常见的公私合营形式（PPP），是公共机构与国防部（MoD）和国防承包商等私营部门公司之间建立的长期合同，由公司筹集的项目资金。通常，私营部门负责项目的初始设计，建设，运营和维护，从而为低成本建设和最低生命周期成本提供激励。结果，项目风险转移到了私营部门，其中包括减少成本超支和施工期间的延误。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号