• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Jane's international defense review >Nato Seeks More Than A Quick Fix To Its Rapid-reaction Command Structure
【24h】

Nato Seeks More Than A Quick Fix To Its Rapid-reaction Command Structure

机译：北约寻求快速反应命令结构的快速解决方案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

NATO's goal of moving away from its geographically oriented Cold War command structure to one that is lighter, more flexible and more responsive to international crises has been, at best, limited and slow-going and, at worst, fiercely resisted by national militaries fearful of losing jobs and relevance. A new reform strategy based on rapidly detachable joint staff assets from existing headquarters (HQ) now awaits the allies' political approval. But it will cost money - lots of it - to pay for full-strength deployable com-mand-and-control (C2) capabilities. The new command structure for allied operations is based on a 2004 decision by the North Atlantic Council (NAC), NATO's highest political authority. It requires the 26 militaries to be able to launch and sustain two major, simultaneous joint operations and six smaller ones, whether for expeditionary missions or for collective defence across or near NATO's territory. This is the alliance's third attempt since the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 to accelerate the ability of the 26 allies to generate and deploy assets rapidly.
机译：北约的目标是从其地域导向的冷战指挥结构转变为更轻，更灵活，更能应对国际危机的目标，充其量是有限的和缓慢的，在最坏的情况下，遭到担心的国家军方的强烈抵制失去工作和相关性。一项基于可从现有总部迅速分离的联合人员资产的新改革战略正在等待盟国的政治批准。但是，要花全额可部署的命令与控制（C2）功能要花很多钱。新的盟军行动指挥结构基于北约最高政治权力机构北大西洋理事会（NAC）2004年的决定。这就要求26名军事人员必须能够发动和维持两个同时进行的主要联合行动，以及六个较小的行动，无论是用于远征任务还是在北约领土内或附近进行集体防御。这是该联盟自1989年柏林墙倒塌以来的第三次尝试，目的是提高26个盟国迅速生成和部署资产的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号