...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology >Reward and Punishment Sensitivity in Children with ADHD: Validating the Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire for Children (SPSRQ-C)
【24h】

Reward and Punishment Sensitivity in Children with ADHD: Validating the Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire for Children (SPSRQ-C)

机译：多动症儿童的奖励和惩罚敏感性：验证儿童对惩罚的敏感性和对奖励问卷的敏感性（SPSRQ-C）

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study validates the Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire for children (SPSRQ-C), using a Dutch sample of 1234 children between 6–13 years old. Factor analysis determined that a 4-factor and a 5-factor solution were best fitting, explaining 41% and 50% of the variance respectively. The 4-factor model was highly similar to the original SPSRQ factors found in adults (Punishment Sensitivity, Reward Responsivity, Impulsivity/Fun-Seeking, and Drive). The 5-factor model was similar to the 4-factor model, with the exception of a subdivision of the Punishment Sensitivity factor into a factor with ‘social-fear’ items and a factor with ‘anxiety’ items. To determine external validity, scores of three groups of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) were compared on the EFA models: ADHD-only (n = 34), ADHD and autism spectrum disorder (ADHD+ASD; n = 22), ADHD and oppositional defiant disorder (ADHD+ODD; n = 22). All ADHD groups scored higher than typical controls on Reward Responsivity and on the ‘anxiety’ factor (n = 75). The ADHD-only and ADHD+ODD group scored higher than other groups on Impulsivity/Fun-Seeking and Drive, while the ADHD+ASD group scored higher on Punishment Sensitivity. The findings emphasize the value of the SPSRQ-C to quickly and reliably assess a child’s sensitivity to reinforcement, with the aim to provide individually-tailored behavioral interventions that utilize reward and reprimands.
机译：这项研究使用荷兰的1234名6-13岁儿童的样本验证了对儿童的惩罚敏感性和对奖励问卷的敏感性（SPSRQ-C）。因子分析确定4因子和5因子解最合适，分别解释了41％和50％的方差。 4因子模型与成人中发现的原始SPSRQ因子高度相似（惩罚敏感度，奖励响应度，冲动性/寻乐和驱动力）。 5因子模型与4因子模型相似，不同之处在于将惩罚敏感性因子细分为“社会恐惧”项目和“焦虑”项目。为了确定外部效度，我们在EFA模型上比较了三组患有注意力缺陷多动障碍（ADHD）的儿童的得分：仅ADHD（n = 34），ADHD和自闭症谱系障碍（ADHD + ASD; n = 22）， ADHD和对立违抗性障碍（ADHD + ODD； n = 22）。所有ADHD组在奖励响应度和“焦虑”因子（n = 75）方面得分均高于典型对照。仅ADHD和ADHD + ODD组在冲动/寻乐和驾驶方面得分高于其他组，而ADHD + ASD组在惩罚敏感性上得分更高。研究结果强调了SPSRQ-C在快速可靠地评估儿童对强化的敏感性方面的价值，目的是提供利用奖励和谴责的个性化行为干预。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号