• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Academic Ethics >Gaining Institutional Permission: Researching Precarious Legal Status in Canada
【24h】

Gaining Institutional Permission: Researching Precarious Legal Status in Canada

机译：获得机构许可：研究加拿大car可危的法律地位

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

There is limited research into the situations of people living with precarious status in Canada, which includes people whose legal status is in-process, undocumented, or unauthorized, many of whom entered the country with a temporary resident visa, through family sponsorship arrangements, or as refugee claimants. In 2005, a community-university alliance sought to carry out a research study of the lived experiences of people living with precarious status. In this paper, we describe our negotiation of the ethics review process at a Canadian university and the ethical, legal, and methodological issues that emerged. Although being able to guarantee our participants complete confidentiality was essential to the viability of the project due to their vulnerability to detention or deportation, we discovered that the Canadian legal framework limited us to being able to offer them confidentiality "to the fullest extent possible by law." One way to overcome this conflict would have been through the construction of a Wigmore defence, in which we would document that the research would not be possible without assurance of our participants' confidentiality. Such a defence would be tested in court if our research records were subpoenaed by immigration enforcement authorities. Rather than take the risk that this defence would not be successful and would result in our participants being deported, we altered the research methods from using multiple interviews to establish trust (which would have required that we store participants' contact information) to meeting participants only once to discuss their experiences of living with precarious legal status in Canada. Our encounter with the 'myth of confidentiality' raised questions about the policing of knowledge production.
机译：在加拿大，对处于不稳定状态的人的情况的研究很少，其中包括合法身份正在处理，无证件或未经授权的人，其中许多人通过家庭赞助安排以临时居留签证进入加拿大。作为难民索赔人。 2005年，一个社区大学联盟试图对处于不稳定状态的人们的生活经历进行一项研究。在本文中，我们描述了我们在加拿大一所大学进行的道德审查程序的谈判以及出现的道德，法律和方法问题。尽管由于他们容易被拘留或驱逐出境而能够保证我们参与者的完全机密对于该项目的可行性至关重要，但我们发现加拿大法律框架将我们限制为“在法律上可能的最大范围内”为他们提供机密性。”解决这种冲突的一种方法是通过建立威格莫尔防御系统，在该系统中，我们将证明，如果不能确保参与者的机密性，就不可能进行研究。如果我们的研究记录受到移民执法部门的传唤，那么这种抗辩将在法庭上进行测试。我们没有冒此辩护不会成功并会导致我们的参与者被驱逐出境的风险，而是将研究方法从使用多次访谈建立信任（这需要我们存储参与者的联系信息）改为仅与参与者会面曾经讨论过他们在加拿大享有不稳定法律地位的生活。我们与“机密神话”的相遇引发了有关知识生产监管的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号