• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Air Law and Commerce >RETHINKING CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS: WIDESPREAD ELECTROMAGNETIC JAMMING BY STATES INDICATES CYBER INTERFERENCE IS NOT A USE OF FORCE
【24h】

RETHINKING CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS: WIDESPREAD ELECTROMAGNETIC JAMMING BY STATES INDICATES CYBER INTERFERENCE IS NOT A USE OF FORCE

机译：重新思考网络空间操作：各国广泛的电磁干扰表明网络干扰不是力量的使用

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Interference by cyber means as potential use of force should be analyzed under Article 41 of the U.N. Charter and State practice of electromagnetic interference during peacetime. The U.N. Charter framers did a remarkable job of defining and developing jus ad bellum for communication interruption. The ordinary meaning of Article 41 and the drafting history of the U.N. Charter support the ordinary reading. Additionally, State practice of jamming during peacetime has occurred for ninety years, and nearly every nation has engaged in various forms of electromagnetic interference involving GPS, television and radio broadcasts, and satellite operations.354 The status of jus ad bellum for interference by cyber means may cause negative political, economic, or other effects. The solution to these negative consequences lies in the traditional means of changing international law.
机译：Cyber意味着作为潜在使用力的干扰，应当根据U.N的第41条分析和平干扰在平时的电磁干扰的状态。 U.n. Charter Framers在定义和开发Jus Ad Bellum以进行通信中断的卓越作业。 第41条的普通含义和U.N.Charter的起草历史支持普通阅读。 此外，在和平时期发生干扰的状态实践已经发生在九十年中，几乎每个国家都从事各种形式的电磁干扰，涉及GPS，电视和无线电广播和卫星操作.354 Jus Ad Bellum因网络的干扰状态 可能造成负面政治，经济或其他影响。 这些负面后果的解决方案在于改变国际法的传统方式。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Air Law and Commerce》 |2021年第2期|219-277|共59页
  • 作者

    VINCENT L. DEFABO;

  • 作者单位

    American University and LL.M. from University of Nebraska-Lincoln in Space Cyber and Telecommunications Law;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号