No Joke: A Comparison of Substance in The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and Broadcast Network Television Coverage of the 2004 Presidential Election Campaign

Julia R. Fox; Glory Koloen; Volkan Sahin

首页> 外文期刊>Journal of broadcasting & electronic media >No Joke: A Comparison of Substance in The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and Broadcast Network Television Coverage of the 2004 Presidential Election Campaign

【24h】

No Joke: A Comparison of Substance in The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and Broadcast Network Television Coverage of the 2004 Presidential Election Campaign

机译：不开玩笑：与乔恩·斯图尔特（Jon Stewart）的每日节目中的实质内容和2004年总统大选的广播网络电视报道的比较

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

This study examined substantive political coverage of the first presidential debate and the political conventions in 2004 on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and the broadcast television networks' nightly newscasts. The study found the networks' coverage to be more hype than substance and coverage on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart to be more humor than substance. The amount of substantive information in The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and the broadcast network newscasts was the same, regardless of whether the unit of analysis was news stories about the presidential election campaign or the entire half-hour program.

机译：这项研究审查了第一次总统辩论的实质性政治报道和2004年与乔恩·斯图尔特（Jon Stewart）进行的每日秀以及广播电视网络的夜间新闻播报中的政治公约。这项研究发现，网络的报道比实质要炒作，乔恩·斯图尔特（Jon Stewart）的《每日秀》的报道比实质更幽默。无论分析单位是关于总统竞选活动还是整个半小时节目的新闻报道，与乔恩·斯图尔特（Jon Stewart）进行的“每日秀”和广播网络新闻广播的实质性信息量都是相同的。

著录项

来源
《Journal of broadcasting & electronic media》 |2007年第2期|213-227|共15页
作者
Julia R. Fox; Glory Koloen; Volkan Sahin;
展开▼
作者单位

Department of Telecommunications at Indiana University-Bloomington;

展开▼
收录信息美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类文化、科学、教育、体育;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献

1. Partisan Balance and Bias in TV Network Coverage of the 2000, 2004, and 2008 Presidential Elections [J] . Arvind Diddi, Frederick Fico, Geri Alumit Zeldes Journal of broadcasting & electronic media . 2014,第2期

机译：2000、2004和2008年总统大选在电视网络报道中的党派平衡和偏见
2. Broadcast and Cable Network News Coverage of the 2004 Presidential Election: An Assessment of Partisan and Structural Imbalance [J] . Frederick Fico, Geri Alumit Zeldes, Serena Carpenter, Mass Communication and Society . 2008,第3期

机译：2004年总统大选的广播和有线网络新闻报道：党派和结构失衡的评估
3. The Broadcast of the Candidates’ Election Campaign for the 2018 Presidential Election on CRTV: Mediatization of Policy Discourse: Strategy, Forms and Figures [J] . Ndibi Ola’A Fréderic Advances in Journalism and Communication . 2020,第2期

机译：2018年CRTV总统选举的候选人选举活动的广播：政策话语的调解：战略，形式和数字
4. Negative television spots during the 2004 presidential election and its effects on voter turnout. [D] . Pirnazar, Darius. 2005

机译：2004年总统大选期间电视上的负面报道及其对选民投票率的影响。
5. Dynamic Network Logistic Regression: A Logistic Choice Analysis of Inter- and Intra-Group Blog Citation Dynamics in the 2004 US Presidential Election [O] . Zack W. Almquist, Carter T. Butts -1

机译：动态网络Logistic回归：2004年美国总统大选期间组内和组内Blog引用动态的Logistic选择分析
6. The role of television broadcasts on voters’ participation in Nigeria’s presidential election [O] . Aririguzoh Stella A. 2015

机译：电视广播在选民参与尼日利亚总统选举中的作用

No Joke: A Comparison of Substance in The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and Broadcast Network Television Coverage of the 2004 Presidential Election Campaign

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅