• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Building Survey, Appraisal & Valuation >Serving valid notices: Not as simple as it first appears
【24h】

Serving valid notices: Not as simple as it first appears

机译：提供有效的通知：并非像初次显示时那样简单

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Serving valid notices is the essential first step in progressing a request to exercise rights granted by the Party Wall etc. Act 1996. It is an entirely sound assumption that if an initial party wall notice is invalid, then any resultant associated award served must also be invalidand any works progressed by way of that award could be found to be unlawful. Serving notices is often perceived as an inconvenient and generic exercise to which only limited attention and time is afforded. In these overly litigious times, a review of the common pitfalls and misconceptionsrelated to the serving of party wall notices is essential. When considering ‘serving valid notices’, it is necessary to consider both the means of creating valid notices and the means by which such valid notices are served. The following key areas of party wall practice and associatedcase law are therefore explored in this paper: the sections of the Act which prescribe service requirements; types of notices — Line of Junction, Section 2, Adjacent Excavation and all other lesser used notices and how to ensure they are validly drafted; ensuring notices are served onthe correct person and/or legal entity; validly noting owner details. Key findings are: a detailed description of proposed notifiable works is essential; the service provisions of Sections 15(1) and 15(2) must be taken in their literal sense; notices served on a ‘body corporate’must be served on the ‘Secretary or Clerk’; Section 1 notices must accurately describe the intended wall and differentiate between Section 1(2) and 1(5) rights; Section 6 notices must include detailed drawings and elevations and full details of any strengthening or safeguardingworks if proposed; notices must always list all owners in full; always record proof of service; building owners must be asked if it is intended to change the building owner entity; Section 12(1) notice must be served before any associated notifiable works commence.
机译：送达有效的通知是执行要求行使1996年《政党隔离墙》授予的权利的重要的第一步。完全合理的假设是，如果最初的政党隔离墙通知无效，那么也必须同时提供任何由此产生的相关裁决无效，并且通过该奖项进行的任何作品都可能被视为非法。送达通知通常被认为是一种不便的通用练习，只能给予有限的关注和时间。在这些诉讼过度的时代，对与送达政党墙告示有关的常见陷阱和误解进行审查至关重要。在考虑“提供有效通知”时，既要考虑创建有效通知的方式，又要考虑提供有效通知的方式。因此，本文探讨了政党隔离墙实践和相关判例法的以下关键领域：法案中规定服务要求的部分；告示类型-交界处第2节“相邻挖掘”及所有其他较少使用的告示，以及如何确保其有效草拟；确保将通知送达正确的人和/或法人实体；有效地注明所有者的详细信息。主要发现是：对拟议的法定作品的详细描述至关重要。第15（1）和15（2）条的服务条款必须从字面上理解；在“法人团体”上发布的通知必须在“秘书或文员”上发布；第1节通知必须准确描述预定的隔离墙，并区分第1（2）和1（5）节的权利；第6节的通知必须包括详细的图纸和立面图，以及所有加固或防护工程的完整细节（如果提出）；通知必须始终完整列出所有所有者；始终记录服务证明；必须询问建筑物所有者是否打算更改建筑物所有者实体；在进行任何相关的应通报工程之前，必须送达第12（1）条通知。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号