• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Building Survey, Appraisal & Valuation >Negligent valuation de-constructed: What is negligence at law? What are the practicalities in helping to avoid a claim?
【24h】

Negligent valuation de-constructed: What is negligence at law? What are the practicalities in helping to avoid a claim?

机译：疏忽估价被解构：什么是法律疏忽？帮助避免索赔有哪些实际可行的方法？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The implications of negligent valuation are imparted to surveyors from their student days and throughout their careers. Although without the emotive issues surrounding areas such as medicine, the financial impact with real estate transactions can ruin firms and individuals and, at theleast, impact insurance premiums. Claims against valuers in negligence continue unabated, peaking when losses are exacerbated through falls in property values. Thus, a deeper understanding of how, practically, to fulfil the duty of care in valuation work is of relevance to all working in thisarea. The basis of negligence at law is set out with a brief review of the development of that law since the 19th century and a round-up of selected cases allowing them to provide lessons to practitioners on the practical means of avoiding a finding of negligent valuation. This paper alsodiscusses the interaction between guidance notes, practice statements and other documents such as terms of engagement and the potential for deviation from professional standards in certain circumstances. It is evident from the law reports that although there has been judicial assertion thatprofessional standards are not law and that non-compliance may not, of itself, constitute negligence, in practice it probably will.
机译：从评估师的学生时代开始，到他们整个职业生涯中，都会忽略评估的含义。尽管没有围绕医学等领域的情感问题，但房地产交易对财务的影响可能使公司和个人破产，并且至少会影响保险费。针对过失的估价师的索偿一直没有减弱，当财产价值下降加剧损失时，索偿达到顶峰。因此，对实际上如何履行评估工作中的谨慎义务的更深入了解与该领域的所有工作都息息相关。对法律过失的基础是对自19世纪以来该法律的发展进行了简要回顾，并总结了一些选定的案例，这些案例使他们可以为从业者提供避免发现过失估价的实际方法的经验教训。本文还讨论了指导说明，实践陈述和其他文件（例如聘用条款以及在某些情况下可能偏离专业标准）之间的相互作用。从法律报告中可以明显看出，尽管已经有司法断言说专业标准不是法律，并且不遵守行为本身可能并不构成疏忽，但实际上它可能会构成疏忽。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号