• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Building Survey, Appraisal & Valuation >Darkness on the edge of town? Or is the calculation of consequential losses in dilapidations claims harder than it looks? (Part 1)
【24h】

Darkness on the edge of town? Or is the calculation of consequential losses in dilapidations claims harder than it looks? (Part 1)

机译：城镇边缘的黑暗？还是计算残旧索赔中的间接损失比看起来困难？ （第1部分）

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper addresses one aspect of the quantification of damages for breach of the tenant's covenants to yield up the demised premises in repair at the end of the term: consequential losses. Part one of the paper summarises the different ways of quantifying such damages, shortly restating the contrasting rules in Joyner v. Weeks [1891] 2 QB 31 (CA) and in Ruxley Electronics & Construction v. Forsyth [1996] AC 344 (HL). It also summarises the general law on causation, remoteness of damage, and recovering the reasonable costs of mitigation. Part two of the paper then applies these principles to the specific issues arising in dilapidations cases: loss of rent, the inability to recover service charges, insurance and rates, liability for professional fees and preliminaries, the incidence of VAT, recovering the cost of preparing schedules, recovering the costs of re-certification and liability to pay interest.
机译：本文讨论了由于租户违反契约而造成的损害的量化量化的一个方面，即在期末将修复后的已舍弃房屋出租的后果：间接损失。本文的第一部分总结了量化此类损害的不同方法，并在不久之后重申了Joyner诉Weeks [1891] 2 QB 31（CA）和Ruxley Electronics＆Construction诉Forsyth [1996] AC 344（HL）中的对比规则。 。它还概述了因果关系，损害的范围以及收回合理的缓解成本的一般法律。然后，本文的第二部分将这些原则应用于残旧案件中出现的具体问题：租金损失，无法收回服务费，保险和差rates，专业费用和预付款的责任，增值税发生率，收回准备成本时间表，收回重新认证的费用和支付利息的责任。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号