...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Ethics >Order Ethics: Bridging the Gap Between Contractarianism and Business Ethics
【24h】

Order Ethics: Bridging the Gap Between Contractarianism and Business Ethics

机译：秩序伦理：弥合契约主义与商业伦理之间的鸿沟

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Contract-based approaches have been a focus of attention in business ethics. As one of the grand traditions in political philosophy, contractarianism is founded on the notion that we will never resolve deep moral disagreement. Classical philosophers like Hobbes and Locke, or recent ones like Rawls and Gaus, seek to solve ethical conflicts on the level of social rules and procedures. Recent authors in business ethics have sought to utilize contract-based approaches for their field and to apply it to concrete business dilemmas. However, the application of contractarianism to management contexts can cause difficulties. Our article discusses this conceptual problem of contractarian business ethics and presents the idea of order ethics as an alternative. Order ethics, as we argue, can make a difference by conceptually bridging the gap between contractarianism and business ethics.
机译：基于合同的方法一直是商业道德中关注的焦点。作为政治哲学的盛大传统之一，契约论建立在我们永远不会解决深层道德分歧的观念上。霍布斯（Hobbes）和洛克（Locke）等古典哲学家，或罗尔斯（Rals）和高斯（Gaus）等最近的哲学家，试图在社会规则和程序的层面上解决伦理冲突。商业道德的新近作者试图在他们的领域中使用基于合同的方法，并将其应用于具体的商业困境。但是，将契约论应用于管理环境会造成困难。本文讨论了合同制商业道德的这一概念性问题，并提出了秩序伦理作为替代方案的思想。我们认为，秩序伦理可以通过在概念上弥合契约主义和商业伦理之间的鸿沟而有所作为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号