...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Ethics >Using Social Identity Theory to Predict Managers' Emphases on Ethical and Legal Values in Judging Business Issues
【24h】

Using Social Identity Theory to Predict Managers' Emphases on Ethical and Legal Values in Judging Business Issues

机译：使用社会认同理论预测管理者在判断业务问题时对道德和法律价值观的重视

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The need to fill three gaps in ethics research in a business context sparked the current study. First, the distinction between the concepts of "ethical" and "legal" needs to be incorporated into theory building and empiricism. Second, a unifying theory is needed that can explain the variables that influence managers to emphasize ethics and legality in their judgments. Third, empirical evidence is needed to confirm the predictive power of the unifying theory, the discernable influence of personal and organizational variables, and the importance of the issue to the managers in determining their emphasis on the ethical and legal values of their judgments. Focused on these needs, the current research combines social identity theory with empirical findings from business ethics research. This theory building initiative framed hypothesis-driven research to investigate the influences on managers' emphasis on ethical and legal values in making business judgments. An empirical research study was conducted involving 252 practicing managers who judged 12 newsworthy business events. Data was collected on the managers' individual factors, on the groups that influence their judgments, and on the importance that the managers place on ethics and legality in judging the 12 scenarios. The research findings contribute to theory development (1) By successfully utilizing a blended extension of social identity and issue-contingent theories to understand managers' judgments, and (2) By providing evidence on the relationships between the perceived importance of an issue and the emphases managers place on ethical and legal values in their judgments. The analysis of the data was extended to provide insights on the needs of employers to tailor management training on legal and ethical decision-making. The participating managers were clustered according to their emphases on Ethical Importance and Legal Importance in judging business situations. Analysis of Variance was then combined with Scheffe Multiple Comparison Tests to assess whether the factors derived from a blended extension of social identity and issue-contingent theories were significantly different across the clusters. The product of this analysis is unique sets of attributes that describe each cluster of managers, and provide an empirical basis for determining training priorities. Finally, the carefully constructed and thoroughly tested 12 research scenarios that form the core of the survey instrument enable their redeployment in subsequent research and their use by practicing executives who wish to compare data provided by their managers to results from the study participants.
机译：在商业环境中填补伦理学研究的三个空白的需求引发了当前的研究。首先，“伦理”和“法律”概念之间的区别需要纳入理论建构和经验主义之中。其次，需要一种统一的理论，该理论可以解释影响管理者在其判断中强调道德和合法性的变量。第三，需要经验证据来确认统一理论的预测能力，个人和组织变量的可识别影响，以及该问题对管理人员在决定他们对判断的道德和法律价值的重视方面的重要性。针对这些需求，当前的研究将社会认同理论与商业道德研究的经验发现相结合。该理论构建倡议以假设驱动的研究为框架，以调查在做出业务判断时对经理强调道德和法律价值的影响。进行了一项涉及252名从业经理的实证研究，他们判断了12个值得新闻报道的商业事件。收集了有关管理人员的个人因素，影响其判断的群体以及管理人员在判断12种情况时重视道德和合法性的数据。研究结果有助于理论发展（1）通过成功地利用社会认同和偶然性理论的混合扩展来理解管理者的判断，以及（2）通过提供关于问题的感知重要性与重点之间关系的证据管理人员在其判断中重视道德和法律价值观。扩展了数据分析，以提供有关雇主需求的见解，以量身定制有关法律和道德决策的管理培训。在判断业务状况时，根据对道德重要性和法律重要性的重视程度将参与管理的人员聚集在一起。然后将方差分析与Scheffe多重比较检验相结合，以评估在整个集群中，由社会认同感和偶发性理论的混合延伸所产生的因素是否存在显着差异。此分析的结果是一组独特的属性集，这些属性描述了每个管理者群，并为确定培训优先级提供了经验基础。最后，经过精心构建并经过全面测试的12个研究场景构成了调查工具的核心，可以通过希望将其管理者提供的数据与研究参与者的结果进行比较的执业高管，将其重新部署到后续研究中并加以使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号