...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Different types of environmental regulations and the heterogeneous influence on the environmental total factor productivity: Empirical analysis of China's industry
【24h】

Different types of environmental regulations and the heterogeneous influence on the environmental total factor productivity: Empirical analysis of China's industry

机译：不同类型的环境法规及其对环境全要素生产率的异质影响：中国产业的实证分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Faced with the dual constraints of economic growth and energy conservation and emission reduction, the unified environmental regulation policy has posed a dilemma for China. First, this paper adopts the method of Metafrontier Malmquist-Luenberger (MML) to analyze the influence of technology gaps and pollution emissions on the total factor productivity (TFP) of Chinese industry in the period of 2000-2016. Second, from the perspective of heterogeneity, the paper uses the threshold model to investigate the nonlinear dynamic influence of different types of environmental regulations on the environmental total factor productivity (ETFP) of industrial sectors, attempting to identify the optimal intensity of the environmental regulation and tools combination. The results indicate that due to the presence of industry heterogeneity, the different types of environmental regulations exerted heterogeneous influences on the ETFP in different industries. In heavy-pollution industries, an excessively high intensity of environmental regulation weakened the technological innovation of these enterprises. In moderate-pollution industries, there was found a medium intensity of environmental regulation, with the command-and-control and market-based types of environmental regulation being quite well coordinated. Among slightly polluting industries, there was a significant "N-shaped" characteristic between the market-based type of environmental regulation and the ETFP. The outcomes further imply that considering the presence of obvious industry heterogeneity, the establishment of environmental regulations should avoid both the unified adoption of static standards and the blind increase of regulation intensity. Based on the characteristics and realities of different industries, flexible and dynamic regulatory standards should be adopted, and multiple regulation instruments should be used. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译：面对经济增长和节能减排的双重制约，统一的环境监管政策给中国带来了困境。首先，本文采用Metafrontier Malmquist-Luenberger（MML）方法，分析了2000年至2016年间技术差距和污染排放对中国工业全要素生产率（TFP）的影响。其次，从异质性的角度出发，本文使用阈值模型研究了不同类型的环境法规对工业部门的环境全要素生产率（ETFP）的非线性动态影响，试图确定环境法规的最佳强度和工具组合。结果表明，由于行业异质性的存在，不同类型的环境法规对不同行业的ETFP产生了异质性影响。在重污染行业，过度高强度的环境监管削弱了这些企业的技术创新。在中度污染行业中，发现环境监管的强度中等，指挥与控制以及基于市场的环境监管类型得到了很好的协调。在轻度污染的行业中，基于市场的环境法规与ETFP之间存在明显的“ N形”特征。结果还暗示，考虑到存在明显的行业异质性，环境法规的建立应避免统一采用静态标准和避免盲目增加法规强度。根据不同行业的特点和实际情况，应采用灵活，动态的监管标准，并应采用多种监管手段。 （C）2018 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号