...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of comparative economics >Political cycles in public expenditure: butter vs guns
【24h】

Political cycles in public expenditure: butter vs guns

机译：公共支出的政治周期：黄油与枪支

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper explores, theoretically and empirically, how governments may use the trade off between social and military expenditure to advance their electoral and partisan objectives. Three key results emerge. First, governments tend to bias outlays towards social expenditure and away from military expenditure at election times. Second, the size of this tradeoff is larger when we exclude countries involved in conflict, where national security plays an important role on voter choice. Third, while certain categories of social expenditure are higher during left administrations, military expenditure is higher during right administrations. Journal of Comparative Economics 45 (2017) 582-604. Department of Politics and International Studies, Social Sciences Building, The University of Warwick, Coven try, CV4 7AL, United Kingdom; Department of Economics, University of Sheffield, 9 Map pin Street, Sheffield, S1 4DT, United Kingdom; Department of Economics, University of Sheffield, 9 Mappin Street, Sheffield, S1 4DT, United Kingdom. (C) 2016 Association for Comparative Economic Studies. Published by Elsevier Inc.
机译：本文从理论和经验上探讨了政府如何利用社会和军事支出之间的权衡来实现其选举和党派目标。出现了三个关键结果。首先，政府倾向于在选举时将支出偏向社会支出，而不是军事支出。其次，当我们排除卷入冲突的国家时，这种折衷的规模更大，而在这些国家中，国家安全在选民选择中起着重要作用。第三，虽然某些类别的社会支出在左翼政府中较高，但军事支出在右翼政府中较高。比较经济学杂志45（2017）582-604。英国沃里克大学社会科学大楼政治与国际研究系，Coven try，CV4 7AL，英国；谢菲尔德大学经济系，英国谢菲尔德S1 4DT，谢菲尔德街9号；英国谢菲尔德大学S1 4DT，谢菲尔德大学Mappin Street 9号，谢菲尔德大学经济系。 （C）2016年比较经济研究协会。由Elsevier Inc.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号