• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Competition Law and Economics >WHAT DOES THE CHICAGO SCHOOL TEACH ABOUT INTERNET SEARCH AND THE ANTITRUST TREATMENT OF GOOGLE?
【24h】

WHAT DOES THE CHICAGO SCHOOL TEACH ABOUT INTERNET SEARCH AND THE ANTITRUST TREATMENT OF GOOGLE?

机译：芝加哥学校关于互联网搜索和GOOGLE的反义词处理方法是什么？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Antitrust agencies in the United States and the European Union began investigating Google's search practices in 2010. Google's critics have consisted mainly of its competitors, particularly Microsoft, Yelp, TripAdvisor, and other search engines. They have alleged that Google is making it more difficult for them to compete by including specialized search results in general search pages and limiting access to search inputs, including “scale,” Google content, and the Android platform. Those claims contradict real-world experiences in search. They demonstrate competitors' efforts to compete not by investing in efficiency, quality, or innovation, but by using antitrust law to punish the successful competitor. The Chicago School of law and economics teaches—and the Supreme Court has long affirmed—that antitrust law exists to protect consumers, not competitors. Penalizing Google's practices as anticompetitive would violate that principle, reduce dynamic competition in search, and harm the consumers that the antitrust laws are intended to protect.
机译：美国和欧盟的反托拉斯机构于2010年开始调查Google的搜索行为。谷歌的批评者主要是其竞争对手，尤其是微软，Yelp，TripAdvisor和其他搜索引擎。他们声称，通过在常规搜索页面中包含专门的搜索结果，并限制对搜索输入（包括“ scale”，Google内容和Android平台）的访问，Google使其竞争变得更加困难。这些主张与现实世界中的搜索体验相矛盾。它们证明了竞争者的竞争努力不是通过投资效率，质量或创新，而是通过使用反托拉斯法来惩罚成功的竞争者。芝加哥法律和经济学院教导说-反垄断法的存在是为了保护消费者，而不是竞争者，而且最高法院早已确认。将Google的行为视为反竞争行为将受到惩罚，这将违反该原则，减少动态搜索竞争，并损害反托拉斯法旨在保护的消费者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号