• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of consumer policy >How Consumer Law Travels
【24h】

How Consumer Law Travels

机译：消费者法的行进方式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article synthesizes a number of the findings and themes emerging from the various case studies presented about the efficacy of the transplantation process of the EU consumer acquis in some of the EU accession and new Member States. Specifically, the article examines the process of incorporation through the lens of the domestication of the consumer rules either through the making of the local consumer laws or their subsequent enforcement in the case study jurisdictions. The overall conclusions from the case studies are that accession pressures are an important impetus for legal reform in consumer law, that there is limited tailoring of the rules in their transposition, and that there is slow take up by local actors in the resolution of consumer problems. The article suggests that getting it right in the law-making process in tailoring the rules to local needs or the extant local law may not be crucial for their subsequent efficacy, both because deliberations about the efficacy and fit of the rules may be irresolvable ex ante and because the relevant collocutors often do not exist at the time of original enactment of the consumer laws. Yet if the transplanted rules can be enlivened through local institutions as spaces for contestation of the rights and responsibilities that arise under consumer law, they can be domesticated or contextualized precisely through processes of ongoing contestation. From that perspective, it is institutional diversity in implementation in different jurisdictions, remedial hybridity and EU monitoring of the efficacy of local solutions that can help unblock suboptimal local outcomes.
机译：本文综合了各种案例研究中得出的许多发现和主题，这些案例研究介绍了欧盟加入国和新成员国中欧盟消费者收购的移植过程的功效。具体而言，本文通过制定本地消费者法律或随后在案例研究辖区执行这些法律，从消费者规则驯化的角度考察了合并的过程。案例研究的总体结论是，加入压力是推动消费者法法律改革的重要动力，规则在转换过程中的适应性有限，当地参与者在解决消费者问题方面的工作缓慢。文章建议，在立法过程中正确制定规则以适应当地需求或现行的当地法律可能对其后续效力并不重要，因为对规则效力和适用性的讨论可能事前无法解决。并且因为在最初制定消费者法时通常不存在相关的同伙。但是，如果可以通过地方机构将移植的规则作为竞争消费者法律所产生的权利和责任的空间来加以充实，则可以通过正在进行的竞争过程将这些规则驯化或具体化。从这个角度来看，正是在不同司法管辖区实施的机构多样性，补救性混合性以及欧盟对本地解决方案有效性的监控，可以帮助消除次优的本地结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号