首页> 外文期刊>Journal of consumer policy >Mix-Up: Models of Governance and Framing Opportunities in U.S. and EU Consumer Policy
【24h】

Mix-Up: Models of Governance and Framing Opportunities in U.S. and EU Consumer Policy

机译:混合:美国和欧盟消费者政策中的治理模式和机会机遇模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Students of comparative politics have highlighted different styles of regulation in the U.S. and Europe. These differences also apply to consumer policy and its different models of governance. The paper holds that governance is a key variable but adds aspects of issue framing. Two examples of consumer policy are analysed: regulation of genetically modified organisms and tobacco control. The case studies show that features of governance such as adversarial legalism or the precautionary principle are not necessarily linked to distinctive styles of regulation. Instead they vary across policy fields. Only a mix of governance elements and framing opportunities for interest groups can explain output and new directions of consumer policy. Dilemmas of collective action appear to be shrinking for consumers because framing trumps mobilization of members.
机译:比较政治学的学生强调了美国和欧洲的不同监管方式。这些差异也适用于消费者政策及其不同的治理模式。本文认为治理是关键变量,但增加了问题框架的方面。分析了消费者政策的两个例子:转基因生物的监管和烟草控制。案例研究表明,对抗性法制或防范原则等治理特征不一定与独特的监管方式相关。相反,它们在策略字段之间有所不同。利益相关者的治理元素和机会的结合只能解释消费者政策的输出和新方向。对于消费者而言,集体行动的困境似乎正在缩小,因为框架胜过成员的动员。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of consumer policy》 |2005年第2期|p.203-230|共28页
  • 作者

    Christoph Struenck;

  • 作者单位

    Heinrich-Heine-University, Duesseldorf, Germany;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 f;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号