• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Consumer Policy >Unfair Consumer Contract Terms Under Macedonian Law: How the Old and the New Function in Practice
【24h】

Unfair Consumer Contract Terms Under Macedonian Law: How the Old and the New Function in Practice

机译：马其顿法律下的不公平消费者合同条款：实践中的新旧功能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article analyses the functioning in practice of the system of substantive regulation of unfair terms in consumer contracts, introduced into Macedonian law as part of the harmonization obligations of the EU accession process. Specifically, the article seeks to establish the possible reasons for the absence of substantial evidence of application of the rules on unfair contract terms in consumer contracts in Macedonian practice. In providing an explanation, the focus is on the transposition of the consumer acquis and the Unfair Contract Terms Directive into national law, the enforcement structure for consumer law, and the relationship with the pre-existing civil law. In sum, the inconsistencies and incompleteness of the transposition, the weak and complex enforcement structure, as well as the unsettled relationship with the already existing civil law rules on similar topics have all contributed to weaken the practical significance of the special law on unfair contract terms.
机译：本文分析了对消费者合同中不公平条款进行实质性监管的制度在实践中的功能，该制度被引入马其顿法律中，作为欧盟加入程序中统一义务的一部分。具体而言，本文力图确定在马其顿实践中缺乏大量证据证明在消费者合同中不公平合同条款规则的适用的可能原因。在提供解释时，重点是将消费者的获取和不公平合同条款指令转化为国家法律，消费者法的执行结构以及与先前存在的民法的关系。总而言之，换位的不一致和不完整，执行结构薄弱和复杂，以及与已经存在的类似主题的民法规则之间的不稳定关系，都削弱了特别法对不公平合同条款的实际意义。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号