• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities >Validity of the Asperger Syndrome Diagnostic Scale
【24h】

Validity of the Asperger Syndrome Diagnostic Scale

机译：阿斯伯格综合症诊断量表的有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Until publication of the Asperger Syndrome Diagnostic Scale (ASDS) in 2001, no standardized and nationally-normed instrument existed specifically for the purpose of diagnosing Asperger syndrome (AS) [Myles et al., 2001. Asperger Syndrome Diagnostic Scale ASDS), PRO-ED, Austin]. This study sought to augment the existing psychometric data on the ASDS through examination of its divergent, convergent, and discriminative validity. Measures of AS, autism, and social skills competence were administered to 76 children with AS, autism, intellectually gifted children, and a control group of typically developing children without AS or autism. Results supported the divergent and convergent validity of the ASDS. Discriminative validity was partially supported. The ASDS was the best discriminator between children with AS and those without AS. Diagnostic accuracy for those with AS and autism was enhanced when scores on the ASDS were combined with scores on the Gilliam Autism Rating Scale (GARS) and the Social Skills Rating System (SSRS). Findings are discussed relative to the debate over the external validity of AS and the resulting limitations on research in the area.
机译：在2001年发布《阿斯伯格综合症诊断量表》（ASDS）之前，还没有专门用于诊断阿斯伯格综合症（AS）的标准化且全国通用的仪器[Myles等，2001。《阿斯伯格综合症诊断量表》 ASDS，PRO- ED，奥斯丁]。这项研究试图通过检查ASDS的不同性，收敛性和判别有效性来增加ASDS上现有的心理测量数据。对76名患有AS，自闭症，有智力天赋的儿童和一个对照组（通常是没有AS或自闭症的典型发育儿童）进行了AS，自闭症和社交技能能力的测量。结果支持了ASDS的不同性和收敛性。歧视性有效性得到部分支持。 ASDS是有AS儿童和没有AS儿童的最佳区分。将ASDS上的分数与Gilliam自闭症评定量表（GARS）和社交技能评定系统（SSRS）的得分相结合，可以提高AS和自闭症患者的诊断准确性。相对于关于AS的外部有效性及其在该领域研究中的局限性的辩论，对发现进行了讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号